Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:09 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

But didn't at the end as in 'didn't have the ball' you assumed I meant for the full tackle which was wrong. Watch it again Burn is up ended head first. Yeaman then adjusts so as to put him down safely.
If Yeaman had driven down it would have been a speak which is why I said 'spear position' instead 'gave him a spear'.

If Yeaman put him down safely then what point are you trying to argue? That Burns is allowed to kick out because Yeaman made sure he didn't get injured?

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:09 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

But didn't at the end as in 'didn't have the ball' you assumed I meant for the full tackle which was wrong. Watch it again Burn is up ended head first. Yeaman then adjusts so as to put him down safely.
If Yeaman had driven down it would have been a speak which is why I said 'spear position' instead 'gave him a spear'.

So nothing wrong with it as he adjusted......see it week in week out when players adjust but you seem to be wanting a argument on every topic.....Yeaman was spoken too but that's it.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:10 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

Read what I posted again.
When Burns was lifted the ball had gone. So I'm not wrong just as neither is Baldy.

burns is a fanny. If he wasn't he'd still be playing in the NRL

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:11 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Correct. He took a blow to the head as he was tackled touching down. Nothing malicious as far as I could see, just one of those things.

However had he not been tripped he would probably have crossed the line unopposed and possibly avoided the injury he got.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:15 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

So nothing wrong with it as he adjusted......see it week in week out when players adjust but you seem to be wanting a argument on every topic.....Yeaman was spoken too but that's it.

If we hadn't scored that is a penalty all day long yet you seem to think Burns should just say 'Thanks Kirk I enjoy seeing my legs above my head when the ball has gone'.
Like I said if the boot was on the other foot you would have been red in the face with rage.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:15 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

burns is a fanny. If he wasn't he'd still be playing in the NRL

Correct. Immeasurably more comfortable for him to strut about and shout the odds in a mid table SL team now he can't hack it at the top level.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:17 pm  

Hasbag wrote:

If Yeaman put him down safely then what point are you trying to argue? That Burns is allowed to kick out because Yeaman made sure he didn't get injured?

Yeaman shouldn't have put him in that position to begin with.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:19 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

Yeaman shouldn't have put him in that position to begin with.

Yeah good point, 3 game ban I'd say.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:20 pm  

Anakin Skywalker wrote:

Yeaman shouldn't have put him in that position to begin with.

Oh give over.........why don't we just play tig rugby.......burns wants a fight every game,he isn't adverse to dishing it out either...Ben Crooks from behind last yr and he's had a few digs this year.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 2:22 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Correct. Immeasurably more comfortable for him to strut about and shout the odds in a mid table SL team now he can't hack it at the top level.

Bottled it because he knew he'd be a marked man in the NRL after thattackle