Re: Wakefield away : Thu Feb 17, 2022 1:00 pm  

I’ve been reading the posts on Hull Live, and mistakenly thought it wasn’t included in my pass renewal, and thought, gods knows how, it was a further subscription.

But after digging out my original pass renewal details, there is a voucher included, with 50% off Hull Live, think I must of accepted that the voucher was the way to acquire it.

But after reading the rest of the bumph it does state returning members get Hull Live for 12 months free, as a thank you for keeping faith through the pandemic, so I’ll watch the Wakey game again, and see if Jake really did need a sending off.

Re: Wakefield away : Thu Feb 17, 2022 2:11 pm  

You can freeze frame clearly in this version, initial contact appears to be around the shoulders, but.... https://www.superleague.co.uk/article/2 ... -v-hull-fc

You can freeze frame clearly in this version, initial contact appears to be around the shoulders, but.... https://www.superleague.co.uk/article/2 ... -v-hull-fc

[Chris71]

Re: Wakefield away : Thu Feb 17, 2022 3:15 pm  

ccs wrote: You can freeze frame clearly in this version, initial contact appears to be around the shoulders, but.... https://www.superleague.co.uk/article/2 ... -v-hull-fc I don't think Savelio was too impressed with Gaskills acting either I hope the RFL have a word with him as I don't wanr RL to go the same way as football in that any contact or slightest of touches sees a player go down like they've been hit by Mike Tyson. Unfortunately after his theatrics against our neighbours and the over playing of being hit by Connor, Gaskill is one of the biggest culprits of sportsmanship or should that be unsportsman like conduct.

ccs wrote: You can freeze frame clearly in this version, initial contact appears to be around the shoulders, but.... https://www.superleague.co.uk/article/2 ... -v-hull-fc I don't think Savelio was too impressed with Gaskills acting either I hope the RFL have a word with him as I don't wanr RL to go the same way as football in that any contact or slightest of touches sees a player go down like they've been hit by Mike Tyson. Unfortunately after his theatrics against our neighbours and the over playing of being hit by Connor, Gaskill is one of the biggest culprits of sportsmanship or should that be unsportsman like conduct.

Re: Wakefield away : Thu Feb 17, 2022 4:25 pm  

Radders article on the new disciplinary clampdown seems to infer teams across the river, are not affected by the new ref regime, which river he means is not clear, can’t see it being the river Hull, as our neighbours get just as much flak as we do.

Re: Wakefield away : Mon Feb 21, 2022 12:26 pm  

Just seen this by Dave Rotheram, the RFL’s Chief On-Field Officer... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/36 ... new-season Snip.... The simple summary is as follows: A careless high tackle would start at Grade A, and should lead to at least a penalty; A reckless high tackle would start at Grade B, and should lead to at least a sin-binning as well as a penalty; An intentional high tackle would start at Grade D, and should lead to dismissal. Force is then taken into account, so a reckless high tackle which is also forceful would be upgraded to the next level of sanction. Direct shoulder contact with the head should lead to a dismissal where the shoulder is the first and only part of contact. Finally, video referees are to intervene only when an offence merits a sin-binning or a dismissal.

Just seen this by Dave Rotheram, the RFL’s Chief On-Field Officer... https://www.rugby-league.com/article/36 ... new-season Snip.... The simple summary is as follows: A careless high tackle would start at Grade A, and should lead to at least a penalty; A reckless high tackle would start at Grade B, and should lead to at least a sin-binning as well as a penalty; An intentional high tackle would start at Grade D, and should lead to dismissal. Force is then taken into account, so a reckless high tackle which is also forceful would be upgraded to the next level of sanction. Direct shoulder contact with the head should lead to a dismissal where the shoulder is the first and only part of contact. Finally, video referees are to intervene only when an offence merits a sin-binning or a dismissal.

Re: Wakefield away : Mon Feb 21, 2022 4:42 pm  

Gale could cop an eight match ban. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... rd-6696710

Gale could cop an eight match ban. https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... rd-6696710