Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 8:57 pm  

Staffs FC wrote:

He's just decent at SL level. I'd much prefer Smith, Green. Ratchford, Brough to name but a few. Just because we're weak at half back doesn't make Burns better than he is.

But for his ban halfway through last season,burns would have been penriths player of the season last year,which dosnt sound like somebody whose level of play had dropped. Like green and brough,but for me prefer burns and the only benefit of ratchford is he is young and will still improve.Which of your coaches was it let brough go?

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:03 pm  

deslawson wrote:

But for his ban halfway through last season,burns would have been penriths player of the season last year,which dosnt sound like somebody whose level of play had dropped. Like green and brough,but for me prefer burns and the only benefit of ratchford is he is young and will still improve.Which of your coaches was it let brough go?

You're laughing then if you think Burns is the man good luck to you. Brough went just after the Challenge Cup win but he's a much better player now than he was then.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:40 pm  

deslawson wrote:

Burns epitomises what you want in a halfback,good organiser,passionate,gives 100% every game and makes sure everybody in the team gives their all.For me that describes a top rugby league player. Terry newton,ben westwood are 2 examples,hate them when they were against you,but would love to have them on your side.

Why are you almost as shiit as us then?

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:42 pm  

deslawson wrote:

But for his ban halfway through last season,burns would have been penriths player of the season last year,which dosnt sound like somebody whose level of play had dropped. Like green and brough,but for me prefer burns and the only benefit of ratchford is he is young and will still improve.Which of your coaches was it let brough go?

So why did burns leave the nrl then? Was he frightened or just knew he wasn't good enough? Or maybe the pull of greatfield was too much to turn down?

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:46 pm  

Nobody wanted a player who would be banned for 12 matches,which is nearly half a season in oz. Why did miller and rankin come to you,the lure of west hull ?

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:48 pm  

deslawson wrote:

Nobody wanted a player who would be banned for 12 matches,which is nearly half a season in oz. Why did miller and rankin come to you,the lure of west hull ?

No, because they're shiit and can;t get a gig in the nrl much the same as burns

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:50 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Why are you almost as shiit as us then?

We aren't a regular top 4 side like adam said he was going to make you into, he's fallng a tad short wouldn't you say ?

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:55 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

No, because they're shiit and can;t get a gig in the nrl much the same as burns

127 nrl top grade games seem to say a little different to that,he was the difference between the teams yesterday like it or not.

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 9:56 pm  

deslawson wrote:

127 nrl top grade games seem to say a little different to that,he was the difference between the teams yesterday like it or not.

Come on you time to get back in your basket !!

Re: Fc v kr match thread : Sun May 18, 2014 10:02 pm  

deslawson wrote:

127 nrl top grade games seem to say a little different to that,he was the difference between the teams yesterday like it or not.

So on that basis, you're saying you're a one man team.