Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:12 pm  

The Brother wrote:

30k for a pay off

Which saves us 60k over the year then if the HDM figure about his salary is correct.

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:20 pm  

Glad to of got rid and good to see the club making the stance with regards the off the field issues with players, don't know what it is with some players and the crap they get upto.

Bit concerned we are light in the backs now they aren't replacing him, could of done with someone like broughton imo but obviously not an option now.

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:27 pm  

fc casual wrote:

Glad to of got rid and good to see the club making the stance with regards the off the field issues with players, don't know what it is with some players and the crap they get upto.

Bit concerned we are light in the backs now they aren't replacing him, could of done with someone like broughton imo but obviously not an option now.

I'd expect Jack Briscoe to be used as cover. I dont think we're that light. It's created opportunities for some more of our youngsters to stake a claim.

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:35 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

I'd expect Jack Briscoe to be used as cover. I dont think we're that light. It's created opportunities for some more of our youngsters to stake a claim.

Maybe not light in numbers but in the way of experience, alot of responsibility on some young kids next year hopefully they'll come good but if they don't?

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:43 pm  

fc casual wrote:

Maybe not light in numbers but in the way of experience, alot of responsibility on some young kids next year hopefully they'll come good but if they don't?

Thats what im worrying about

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:43 pm  

fc casual wrote:

Maybe not light in numbers but in the way of experience, alot of responsibility on some young kids next year hopefully they'll come good but if they don't?

Thats what im worrying about

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 5:53 pm  

Hazzer wrote:

OK really really stupid question....

Can we pay Raynors legal fees as a contract termination settlement? That wouldnt count on the salary cap would it? ........I should work for Wigan.

yes it would count on the cap , that why Bulls got stufeed when they did similar for Harris

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:31 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

How is loaning them out decimating the squad? They can come back after a month

I think it would be a disgraceful way to treat a youngster. Agar the Terrible tried it with Hall and it was a total disaster. Oh hang on ...

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 7:34 pm  

im sorry to see raynor leave this way was a great player for us with better service over the last couple of years would have been a great ,wish he could have seen his career out in the proper way sad ending for him ,although i have to say its the right call by the club under the cloud what hes under i hope he regains fitness and gets a couple of more good years ,not against us though ,all the best Raynor and thanks for some great moments

Re: Raynor??? : Sat Dec 19, 2009 9:48 pm  

fc casual wrote:

Maybe not light in numbers but in the way of experience, alot of responsibility on some young kids next year hopefully they'll come good but if they don't?

We've got to give them a chance. If they dont we can bring a loan player in.