Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:47 pm  

Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006 wrote:

Put it this way, IF we get fined/penalised in some way by the RFL, bet Pearson will be sueing the arses off Hetherington and her clang. With every right.

Are you joe's stalker with that comment;);)

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 3:59 pm  

jimmyfivebellies wrote:

Are you joe's stalker with that comment;);)

Originality at its best

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:04 pm  

JedRust wrote:

Originality at its best

Tbf,Kath will be bricking it now i reckon,not only by Pearson but also by the rfl.This is the rfl's perfect opportunity to bring kath (and gary) back to reality.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:26 pm  

jimmyfivebellies wrote:

Tbf,Kath will be bricking it now i reckon,not only by Pearson but also by the rfl.This is the rfl's perfect opportunity to bring kath (and gary) back to reality.

Do they want to do that, though?

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:31 pm  

jimmyfivebellies wrote:

The fact Mr Allam is querying how his £1M loan has been used should be more worrying to dobbins fans.That money has now gone,but with no product to show for it.

you couldn't make it up, oh wait you have

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:38 pm  

After reading the HDM over the passed two nights
I find it hard that a Chairperson of a Club knew nothing
that was going on ..What are board Meeting for plus the coach
isn't involved in players being tested ..Reading the his HDM test result didn't
show signs of the banned substance in the urine sample till after the HKR game
then that triggered a "provisional suspension"..Then that when thing started to go
wrong ..People started misleading the fans to why Gleeson wasn't playing

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:52 pm  

MrPhilb wrote:

Only the tip of the iceberg I'm afraid

MrPhilb wrote:

:lol: you couldn't make it up, oh wait you have

Oh, Philip, you're so funny!

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:53 pm  

WormInHand wrote:

Do they want to do that, though?

As I said before, I reckon this will be kicked very definitely into the long grass.

If the RFL decide to start digging, neither they nor anyone else knows what it might uncover. They'll use the UKDA sanctions as a reason for "case closed"

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 4:56 pm  

kt170496 wrote:

After reading the HDM over the passed two nights
I find it hard that a Chairperson of a Club knew nothing
that was going on ..What are board Meeting for plus the coach
isn't involved in players being tested ..Reading the his HDM test result didn't
show signs of the banned substance in the urine sample till after the HKR game
then that triggered a "provisional suspension"..Then that when thing started to go
wrong ..People started misleading the fans to why Gleeson wasn't playing

WormInHand wrote:

What I can't understand, is if he failed the test after Salford on the 13 May, although he didn't play in the cup against Widnes, he did in the league against Hudds and Rovers, before the hearing on June 9th.

Seeming madness, or desperation by the club to keep the pressure off Agar and try to continue the limping "success"?

Agar picked the teams between those dates. Not being legally clued up, I may be reading more into this than necessary, but surely he should have been sidelined pending the investigation?

Yes, at least it's thrown light on this - the test was done after Salford, but the results didn't come through until after the derby. Nothing untoward there, then.

Re: UKDA Confirm Hull FC bans - link : Fri Dec 30, 2011 5:02 pm  

WormInHand wrote:

Yes, at least it's thrown light on this - the test was done after Salford, but the results didn't come through until after the derby. Nothing untoward there, then.

Stop it, you'll be ruining all pleb's masturbatory fantasies now