Re: Raynor??? : Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:19 pm  

Normy Lad wrote:

Q. Which wing will Gaz be on next season?

A. C or B wing !!!

Re: Raynor??? : Sun Dec 20, 2009 4:34 pm  

downtheante wrote:

So, does this open the door for LMS?

I'm lead to believe the door is open for that had Raynor gone or not.

Re: Raynor??? : Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:12 am  

raynor has been a great player for hull, defensively superb, a great off load (if only other players could read it), makes good yards, gets a quick play the ball and with the right service could demonstate his finishing abilitys more often. BUT his off field behaviour is disgraceful, i'm proud of hull fc for making a stand.

briscoe, hall, yeaman, calderwood looks a good 3/4 line with briscoe, tuffour, lyne back up.

Re: Raynor??? : Mon Dec 21, 2009 8:46 am  

Sheldon wrote:

raynor has been a great player for hull, defensively superb, a great off load (if only other players could read it), makes good yards, gets a quick play the ball and with the right service could demonstate his finishing abilitys more often. BUT his off field behaviour is disgraceful, i'm proud of hull fc for making a stand.

briscoe, hall, yeaman, calderwood looks a good 3/4 line with briscoe, tuffour, lyne back up.

You need to update you sig my friend...

Re: Raynor??? : Mon Dec 21, 2009 9:57 am  

Uruguay wrote:

You need to update you sig my friend...

Its not official yet.

Re: Raynor??? : Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:00 am  

Just wish clubs would take this kind of stance with all players that get upto criminal activity and not just because they are also injury prone, high earning and coming to the end of their career etc.

[Kosh]

Re: Raynor??? : Mon Dec 21, 2009 10:08 am  

Danny 2 wrote:

bless

i have a new radio for you next season

If you've got one that will reach all the way from Worcester to Hull I might just be interested.

Re: Raynor??? : Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:06 pm  

Robbo4 wrote:

Just wish clubs would take this kind of stance with all players that get upto criminal activity and not just because they are also injury prone, high earning and coming to the end of their career etc.

if you was to make a list based on rumours or official, i bet there wouldn't be hardly anyone left in superleague.

Re: Raynor??? : Mon Dec 21, 2009 4:18 pm  

fc casual wrote:

if you was to make a list based on rumours or official, i bet there wouldn't be hardly anyone left in superleague.

Quite possibly. I'd still sack anyone found guilty of serious criminal activity and that includes the likes of assault.

Re: Raynor??? : Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:03 pm  

How long before the banner at the top of this page is replaced?