Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:45 pm  

ComeOnYouUll wrote:

Perhaps we were spoilt with three tries in the first ten minutes but we have to be happy with this win, injuries to Obst and Yeaman notwithstanding.

I was delighted with the attitude at the start it was exactly what was required for this game and we got it. It put them on the back foot and they never really looked like catching us.

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:45 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

Too right a comfy away win away is a great result, down to 15 men for most of the game.

Fans being a bit harsh on the team tonight.

Well done Agar and the team.

totally agree!!!

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:46 pm  

Sharp is much better player than Hall, he is much better going forward, Hall scored a wonder try every 10 games, but that was it.

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:46 pm  

Kosh wrote:

So how much is Sharp being paid and how much was Hall on?

In any case, Sharp's defence is fine except under the high ball. Our other winger also has issues with kicks but never gets the same abuse for it from fans.

Our other winger has improved massively at this over the last 18 months.

[Kosh]

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:47 pm  

Staffs FC wrote:

Well possibly so but it's always a good sign when it's the size of the victory that is being discussed and not Agar out. We had some disruption and 3 or 4 individual errors each side of half time. Other than that we've beaten the team just below us and I'm more than happy with that.

Pretty much sums it up for me. Maybe slightly disappointed that we didn't capitalise fully on our excellent start but given the injuries to Obst and Yeaman - our only organiser and our top try scorer - I'm not unhappy.

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:47 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

Think you're being disrespectful, Salford were only 1 point behind us before play and recently put 60 on Bradford.

Maybe but Cas are/were a decent side and Wire have put 62 on them. We need to be doing that sort of thing to the sides below us, regardless of who they've beaten.

I'm happy with the 2 points btw but we're still making mistakes that could cost us (and its also a good sign that I'm thinking that we might be in a position to lose something this season!)

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:47 pm  

Chris1953 wrote:

All I'm saying is he seems exactly the type of player hall was but I dare to say probably on more money, should have kept hall

Hall is that good he can't even play for Dobbins!

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:49 pm  

tommyfromhull wrote:

Hall is that good he can't even play for Dobbins!

To be fair to Hall, that seems to be more down to an alleged fall out with Morgan. Ask the dobbins fans, they've been happy with his performances.

[Kosh]

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:50 pm  

tommyfromhull wrote:

Hall is that good he can't even play for Dobbins!

And none of their fans can work out why, so doesn't appear to be performance related...

Re: Salford Game Thread : Fri May 13, 2011 8:51 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

To be fair to Hall, that seems to be more down to an alleged fall out with Morgan. Ask the dobbins fans, they've been happy with his performances.

I know (just arguing Sharp's corner tbf!).

Well done Hull, we're in good form now. Keep it going, Giants going to be a great match.