Uncle Junior wrote:
That's kind of what I'm getting at though. Season pass sales went up on the basis of a sustained media spin campaign to absolve Agar of any blame for the decline during his reign up to that point, alongside the announcement of some admittedly top class signings for the season ahead.
The problem is though that with the club doing well financially not being seen to spend the full salary cap wouldn't be tolerated by fans, yet the club can spend what they like on a coach and are doing all they can to keep the cheap option in place. That's the cynical part of it.
Cynical, or putting the financial well being of the club first? Even when you consider we have made profit for a few years we are still in debt, so you can't blame the board for wanting to take the cheap option.
As for the actual appointment I posted my views last night and I still feel the same. He is young and inexperienced and is learning all the time. He's a good guy and the players are on his side. I will wait until the end of the season before passing a proper judgement. If we have another poor season then I agree it have been a bad decision. But if we come top 6, win a playoff or 2 and do okay in the cup then you can't really argue with the decision to keep him again.
I think this shows that he was England's first choice too. I can't see why else the club would have moved so early. Also, now the coach is in place I imagine we will start to see some recruitment for next year in the next couple of months.