Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:13 pm  

Think we had some soft penalties given against us also. Rovers definitely milked a few. As Child's was obviously falling for it, I'm disappointed we didn't try it ourselves and just allowed us to be dominated in the tackle.
The worst was when Cockayne threw an elbow back straight into Shaul's face and they got a penalty for holding down.
Anybody else think Cockayne went very high on Yeaman (and late) after he put Talanoa in?

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 1:15 pm  

Hasbag wrote:

Think we had some soft penalties given against us also. Rovers definitely milked a few. As Child's was obviously falling for it, I'm disappointed we didn't try it ourselves and just allowed us to be dominated in the tackle.
The worst was when Cockayne threw an elbow back straight into Shaul's face and they got a penalty for holding down.
Anybody else think Cockayne went very high on Yeaman (and late) after he put Talanoa in?

It's his usual cowardly MO.

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:19 pm  

Not to mention 2 soft penalties in the last 3 minutes that effectively gave rovers the game. Jamie shaul's no try should have been given benefit of the doubt. I think all 3 refs were desperate for rovers to win

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:22 pm  

[quote="Jake the Peg"]Not to mention 2 soft penalties in the last 3 minutes that effectively gave rovers the game. Jamie shaul's no try should have been given benefit of the doubt. I think all 3 refs were desperate for rovers to win[/quot
you been on the pipe all day again jake?

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:23 pm  

[quote="easthull fc fan"]
Nah, just being ironic. Someone will be along at some point to explain it to you

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:25 pm  

Are you alanis morissetes biggest fan?

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 6:28 pm  

What on earth? How anybody can be stupid enough to suggest that wasn't a shoulder charge is beyond me.

It was as clear as day. It wasn't malicious but they are illegal now, and Hull was awarded the penalty. End of story. Personally I'm not sure that they should be illegal at all, but you have to play within the rules of the game.

When people on here start taking their lead from the Sky Commentators, we know that we are in trouble.

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:58 pm  

Bal wrote:

When people on here start taking their lead from the Sky Commentators, we know that we are in trouble.

Frightening isn't it?

Re: James Childs : Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:18 pm  

ffs his name is james CHILD not childs !!!

Re: James Childs : Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:42 am  

How come the refs spent the first 6 or 7 weeks penalising everything that was offside and any interference at the PTB and have suddenly stopped? chlid's policing of the 10 metres on Thursday was pathetic and he was very inconsistent with his penalties at the ptb