Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:43 pm  

major black wrote:

just had a txt saying Hull think the Gale approach has failed due to Bradford offering him an improved contract with added assurances (whatever that means.)

some magic beans? lol

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:45 pm  

major black wrote:

just had a txt saying Hull think the Gale approach has failed due to Bradford offering him an improved contract with added assurances (whatever that means.)

There will be rumour, rumour and counter rumour now until something official is announced!

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:49 pm  

number 6 wrote:

some magic beans? lol

more like the RFL have once again pulled us out of the $hite by not deducting us points.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:51 pm  

Smiggs wrote:

There will be rumour, rumour and counter rumour now until something official is announced!

without doubt.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:13 pm  

I don't get the Gale rumour at all. If its as a replacement for Miller then its a mistake. Gale is a poor player, certainly not the sort to push us on.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:19 pm  

For what its worth miller has potential to be a a good player,gale nothing more than average at best.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:20 pm  

easthullwesty wrote:

I don't get the Gale rumour at all. If its as a replacement for Miller then its a mistake. Gale is a poor player, certainly not the sort to push us on.

I wouldn't say he was poor but I agree about the replacement bit. Think its irrelavent now anyway.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:23 pm  

deslawson wrote:

For what its worth miller has potential to be a a good player,gale nothing more than average at best.

I can't believe I'm saying this but I agree with you (first time for everything I suppose). Although some pundits and so called experts see him as possibly developing into the next England half.

Can't see myself.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:46 pm  

I don't think that Gale will be a replacement for Miller. Yes we know Shaul is a great promise for the future, but Rankin has played his best stuff at FB.

I think it may be a case of Rankin at FB Gale/Miller and Horney in the halves, Shaul maybe out on dual reg to get him week to week games and get a few more bits added to his game.

Carvell would add a bite to an already large pack, with Feka, Paea, Bowden, Green and Watts when return, Mason...not sure about

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:04 pm  

major black wrote:

I can't believe I'm saying this but I agree with you (first time for everything I suppose). Although some pundits and so called experts see him as possibly developing into the next England half.

Can't see myself.

I seem to have mentioned earlier how average Gale was and you threw your dummy out the pram, all of a sudden, it's a change of opinion.

Which experts and pundits have said that?