Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 6:12 pm  

Ian P wrote:

Gawd that was close

Well edited Ian Although I know he doesn't use Daz or Persil

Re: Childs : Tue Apr 05, 2011 9:16 pm  

berrigans bitch wrote:

Agar haters
Now I am sorry Tommy but that is way out of line, I doubt very much any-one on here hates Rich Agar, what is there to hate?...Just because people believe he is not up to the job this does not mean we hate the man



Late edit, Ok Tommy it is fine to say Agar Hater because Gary has it in his sig

Your edit did the job for me

And I don't recall ever been called an apologist. I don't really get it

Re: Childs : Wed Apr 06, 2011 11:07 am  

hullbg wrote:

Well edited Ian Although I know he doesn't use Daz or Persil

Yes, I realised it was a tad too ...................... obvious

Re: Childs : Wed Apr 06, 2011 6:34 pm  

Good to see Cullen highlight the obvious inconsistences for the RFL to look at in Boots and all tonight. (he does seem to have a few good things to say about us recently ,hope he's not lining himself up for a job) but fair play to him on the analysis.

Re: Childs : Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:34 pm  

Forever FC wrote:

Good to see Cullen highlight the obvious inconsistences for the RFL to look at in Boots and all tonight. (he does seem to have a few good things to say about us recently ,hope he's not lining himself up for a job) but fair play to him on the analysis.

He's wearing a black and white tie too so he must be.

Re: Childs : Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:38 pm  

Forever FC wrote:

Good to see Cullen highlight the obvious inconsistences for the RFL to look at in Boots and all tonight. (he does seem to have a few good things to say about us recently ,hope he's not lining himself up for a job) but fair play to him on the analysis.

Just seen it Cullen clearly thinks that Child was a joke as well. It's the first time I have seen Long get smashed on the line it looked worse than it did on the night. Child and the touch judge who was involved in both incidents (Lauaki and Long) are a disgrace.

Re: Childs : Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:39 pm  

Staffs FC wrote:

Just seen it Cullen clearly thinks that Child was a joke as well. It's the first time I have seen Long get smashed on the line it looked worse than it did on the night. Child and the touch judge who was involved in both incidents (Lauaki and Long) are a disgrace.

Should our physio have spotted Long been concussed and removed him before he did that?

Re: Childs : Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:41 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

Should our physio have spotted Long been concussed and removed him before he did that?

I don't think he was that concussed, mate

Re: Childs : Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:44 pm  

tommyfromhull wrote:

I don't think he was that concussed, mate

If you watch Longy straight afterwards, he stumbles away from the action and then charges in at the next tackle. Not excusing him it was something I actually saw and mentioned at the time.

Re: Childs : Wed Apr 06, 2011 7:45 pm  

Locko's Luck wrote:

If you watch Longy straight afterwards, he stumbles away from the action and then charges in at the next tackle. Not excusing him it was something I actually saw and mentioned at the time.

He managed to walk away in a straight line and didn't look concussed after getting the red.