Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:52 pm  

ditchley16 wrote:

beginning to think if we sign carvell,it wont be in time for him to play Friday.

If Bulls decide to be awkward with transferring his registration that could well be the case.

So overall looking like 1 from 3. Carvs is a no brainer but personally would have liked to have seen Gale come. Mason was the stange one but would have been happy on a 3 month pay as you play basis until Watts / Green are fit.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:53 pm  

ditchley16 wrote:

beginning to think if we sign carvell,it wont be in time for him to play Friday.

It's starting to look that way isn't it. I honestly thought it would be done today and announced at todays press conference.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 2:54 pm  

Gerrum on side ref wrote:

If Bulls decide to be awkward with transferring his registration that could well be the case.

So overall looking like 1 from 3. Carvs is a no brainer but personally would have liked to have seen Gale come. Mason was the stange one but would have been happy on a 3 month pay as you play basis until Watts / Green are fit.

I would take every that's being said at the moment, even in press conferences with a pinch of salt.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:12 pm  

Smiggs wrote:

I would take every that's being said at the moment, even in press conferences with a pinch of salt.

Couldn`t agree more, given that Radders said the Carvell deal was compicated in his press conference and then 20mins later James Smailes bumped into Carvell at the FC trainnig ground says it all to me, plenty things going on at the moment and until things are announced offcially rumours will be spreading like wildfire

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 3:37 pm  

major black wrote:

I can't believe I'm saying this but I agree with you (first time for everything I suppose). Although some pundits and so called experts see him as possibly developing into the next England half.

Can't see myself.

I do make sense sometimes,miller could be anything a dud or a good player,gale nearly 26 and not exactly pulled up any trees has he.Stick with youngsters with potential.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:01 pm  

ditchley16 wrote:

beginning to think if we sign carvell,it wont be in time for him to play Friday.

I reckon even if it's done on Wednesday he'd play Friday.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:04 pm  

major black wrote:

I wouldn't say he was poor but I agree about the replacement bit. Think its irrelavent now anyway.

I agree. Not poor, but not better than Miller IMO. I personally think we need to see how Miller can now fit in with the first team and not the academy side.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:22 pm  

major black wrote:

If someone has something to say without it being a blatant attempt to troll then I'll quite happily have a conversation but that is all you do. I didn't disagree at your previous comment either.

I've read comments about him in League express or weekly when we were linked to him a few months ago also seen the on report series on the superleague website true the guy singin his praises is an agent not sure if its his agent though.

Where on earth was the trolling? If you sign Gale you have 4 first choice half backs fighting for two spots. Some players are not going to be happy.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:41 pm  

Ross from the T & A with an update of sorts:

Garreth Carvell linked up with the Hull squad today but Bulls CEO Robbie Hunter-Paul said "Garreth Carvell is contracted to the Bradford Bulls and that contract is registered with the RFL."

So he's training with FC but still a registered Bulls player. This could get messy.

Re: gareth carvell : Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:45 pm  

dddooommm wrote:

Ross from the T & A with an update of sorts:
So he's training with FC but still a registered Bulls player. This could get messy.

He wasnt training with the squad, he had a fitness test and met the squad