: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:03 pm  

UllFC wrote:

we were clearly lied to this evening though, Rule was going on about what a good signing it was only 2 hours ago

How about we just got scan results?

: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:03 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Just a couple of points amongst all the hysteria.

Reardon's contract was contingent upon two conditions...

1. His full recovery from his achilles injury
2. Getting a non-custodial sentence

Clearly, he's failed on the first condition. I doubt he'll have been paid, because until he met the first condition he didn't have an actual contract with us - hence how he can be released swiftly and easily now.

Carry on.

Agreed, but the club should never have associated themselves with him in the first place.

: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:04 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Just a couple of points amongst all the hysteria.

Reardon's contract was contingent upon two conditions...

1. His full recovery from his achilles injury
2. Getting a non-custodial sentence
Clearly, he's failed on the first condition. I doubt he'll have been paid, because until he met the first condition he didn't have an actual contract with us - hence how he can be released swiftly and easily now.

Carry on.

Yes but this information was never given to the fans who piled up pages of venom towards his signing. Another sign that your board dont give a crap about the fans or their reactions.

[Kosh]

: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:04 pm  

MrPhilb wrote:

You named him in a 19 man squad so he has to be contracted and registered with the RFL for that to happen

Being registered with the RFL only requires a valid contract offer agreed by both club and player.

HTH

: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:05 pm  

MrPhilb wrote:

2 weeks pay for having a medical

Pretty sure he was on a pay as you play.

[Kosh]

: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:05 pm  

blakeysrobin wrote:

Yes but this information was never given to the fans who piled up pages of venom towards his signing.

Yes it was.

HTH

: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:06 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Being registered with the RFL only requires a valid contract offer agreed by both club and player.

HTH

I'll take your word for it

: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:06 pm  

clubfoot fc wrote:

Pretty sure he was on a crutches.

Fixed typo.

[Kosh]

: Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:07 pm  

UllFC wrote:

we were clearly lied to this evening though, Rule was going on about what a good signing it was only 2 hours ago

Were we? Or didn't Rule have the full facts during the programme?

Hardly seems much point in telling a blatant lie just 90 minutes before releasing the truth, does there?

Re: Reardon released : Wed Apr 22, 2009 8:08 pm  

dennison15 wrote: http://www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?p=3255 comical NOW it it time for the joke of a board and the joke of a coaching team to p!$$ off and leave this great club alone. i am ashamed to be a Hull fan

dennison15 wrote: http://www.hullfc.com/hullfc/contents/?p=3255 comical NOW it it time for the joke of a board and the joke of a coaching team to p!$$ off and leave this great club alone. i am ashamed to be a Hull fan