Re: James Childs : Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:12 pm  

Zuider wrote:

Seen plenty of comments about how Childs kept skinny 10's - inferring that it somehow cost us the game. What ultimately cost us the game was the lack of a decent goalkicker - as it has in several close games. But also we lacked a player with the nous to exploit the skinny 10's, We need to look at our own players rather than the ref.

whiting kicked the same number of goals as burns. The skinny 10 didn't allow us any momentum in the forwards.

Re: James Childs : Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:25 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

whiting kicked the same number of goals as burns. The skinny 10 didn't allow us any momentum in the forwards.

All the forums and commentators,seemed to agree,you deserved to win and were robbed by the referee and the video refs. Unlucky.

Re: James Childs : Sat Apr 19, 2014 7:39 pm  

Come on mods do the world a favour and press the button .... Pretty pretty please

Re: James Childs : Sat Apr 19, 2014 8:52 pm  

about time you pressed the button, he just comes on and trolls most of the time, just derails everything

Re: James Childs : Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:05 pm  

Only replied to previous posts,so how do I derail a thread ?

Re: James Childs : Sat Apr 19, 2014 9:21 pm  

deslawson wrote:

All the forums and commentators,seemed to agree,you deserved to win and were robbed by the referee and the video refs. Unlucky.

I think you need to go back and read the context of my post des. You're not having a good night

Re: James Childs : Sun Apr 20, 2014 8:20 am  

hull2524 wrote:

about time you pressed the button, he just comes on and trolls most of the time, just derails everything

You can choose to ignore him and then don't have to read the tripe he posts. Press the foe button.