Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 2:03 pm  

Squad:

Bowden, Ellis, Green, Houghton, Logan, Manu, Michaels, Minichiello, Naughton, Paleaaesina, Pritchard, Shaul, Sneyd, Taylor, Thompson, Tuimavave, Washbrook, Watts, Yeaman.

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 2:04 pm  

Spot on. The only blip it's a derby and that's one game I would never ever bet on. Seen to many in the past go to the underdog. Saying that 2 wins for me COYH

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 2:40 pm  

ccs wrote:

Squad:

Bowden, Ellis, Green, Houghton, Logan, Manu, Michaels, Minichiello, Naughton, Paleaaesina, Pritchard, Shaul, Sneyd, Taylor, Thompson, Tuimavave, Washbrook, Watts, Yeaman.

Abdull & Talanoa out, Yeaman & Feka in.

The backs pick themselves, forwards is a tough one for who makes the bench:

Shaul
Michaels
Logan
Yeaman
Naughton
Tuimavave
Sneyd
Taylor
Houghton
Bowden
Mini
Manu
Ellis

Pritchard
Washy
2 from: Feka/Watts/Thompson/Green

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 2:48 pm  

Child reffing. Fat chance of a stormer then.

[Kosh]

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 4:26 pm  

Armavinit wrote:

Radford should do a Smithy!!!

Say he wants control of the club, fail to submit a business plan or any evidence of finance, get turned down, flounce out in a huff, and then snipe at the club on social media?

Seems unlikely.

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 6:19 pm  

We have too much quality to lose this surely?
After the changing room discussion and solid application of game plan plus us not losing the plot if things don't go right the first time then we should tear Wakefield apart, we have to be ruthless and focused from minute one onward.
There is the potential in the team to be a contender, Radfors now has to prove to us he has what it takes to get that potential as near to the maximum as possible.
I feel that if he and the players can put a line in the sand, identify why we have dropped off so badly in the Widnes game we can do something thos season.
I'm fed up of watching a team year after year that on paper have a good chance just not fulfil their potential.

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 6:26 pm  

knockersbumpMKII wrote:

We have too much quality to lose this surely?

So, if the unthinkable happens, who are 'you' going to blame?

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:01 pm  

Isaiah wrote:

So, if the unthinkable happens, who are 'you' going to blame?

As I've stated previously it's 80% the coach and 20% the players and gave my reasons why.
Good quality players can only get you so far, how they perform is by far down to the coaching and preparation not just in basics of rugby but everything else as I've outlined before.

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:15 pm  

if they lose, radford will be gone because Pearson knows half the support will be gone next season!

Re: Wakefield (H) : Wed Mar 16, 2016 7:28 pm  

knockersbumpMKII wrote:

As I've stated previously it's 80% the coach and 20% the players and gave my reasons why.
Good quality players can only get you so far, how they perform is by far down to the coaching and preparation not just in basics of rugby but everything else as I've outlined before.

But you also just said ... "We have too much quality to lose this surely?"
So was you meaning the quality of the coaching staff?