Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:55 pm  

Where has Agar said that Berrigan won't be our hooker next year?

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:58 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

Where has Agar said that Berrigan won't be our hooker next year?

Berrigan's our best centre. Why would we play him as an interchange hooker?

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 5:58 pm  

Panda92 wrote:

From our site
Reading between the lines of that, they've implied that the only space really that's left on the cap will be whatever wage Dowes was on, as he's the only player to have not resigned from last season, and we were at full cap last year, apparently. (I'm assuming that Radford's lower wage and Tickle's increased wage will just about cancel each other out).

There's nothing in those lines never mind between them!
I think that the comments regarding "taking our time" from Agar are more pertinent and suggest that we've maybe just been knocked back on a deal we thought may happen and now are starting again/having to ressurrect other deals? I just hope we don't panic buy.

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 6:04 pm  

Raggytash wrote: I'd rather we went for a season long loan deal with someone like this.... http://www.warriors.co.nz/our-team/play ... un-Johnson And if he liked it here we could sign him in the future. If not, any other Toyota cup boom youngster would be a great option. So would I but anyof these guys that are likley to make it will stay. Johnson is touted by those who know as the next big thing and he's likley to make his debut in the NRL this year. You'd think that there would be plenty of kids over there who can't quite make it but would be better than what we have here but if they have belief in themselves they tend to stick it out.

Raggytash wrote: I'd rather we went for a season long loan deal with someone like this.... http://www.warriors.co.nz/our-team/play ... un-Johnson And if he liked it here we could sign him in the future. If not, any other Toyota cup boom youngster would be a great option. So would I but anyof these guys that are likley to make it will stay. Johnson is touted by those who know as the next big thing and he's likley to make his debut in the NRL this year. You'd think that there would be plenty of kids over there who can't quite make it but would be better than what we have here but if they have belief in themselves they tend to stick it out.

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 6:29 pm  

ChrisH wrote:

There's nothing in those lines never mind between them!

"With ten new faces in the squad last season, a host of players retained on new deals throughout the year and the club operating at salary cap maximum once again, there isn’t much more scope for further movement."

I presumed from that that as Dowes is the only ??? atm, we're roughly at the cap, minus his wage.


That's where I got that idea from, anyway.



As for panic buying, I heard Chris Thorman is looking for a Sl deal......

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 6:40 pm  

got told Zak Hardaker is going leeds rhinos nxt season for £110.000 and being loaned back to fev next year

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 6:41 pm  

Lee Tucker FC Fan 2006 wrote:

got told Zak Hardaker is going leeds rhinos nxt season for £110.000 and being loaned back to fev next year

£110! Bargain! Lets have a whip-around and outbid them!

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 6:43 pm  

i dont read much in rules words,i think its just a case of wait and see.hulls signings tend to come out of the blue anyway.it wouldnt surprise me if we announced a couple of signings in the next fortnight.but at the end of the day nobody outside the club has any idea.

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 7:09 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Berrigan's our best centre. Why would we play him as an interchange hooker?

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Thu Oct 14, 2010 7:16 pm  

[quote="ditchley16"]i dont read much in rules words,i think its just a ..../quote]

article for articles sake that doesnt say anything we didnt already know