Re: More rumours! : Thu Aug 25, 2011 1:18 pm
Standee wrote:
exactly
in fact, it should make us feel less concerned, anyone who has been signed by SL clubs has been told by their old club that they are surplus to requirements, so IF we are signing anyone they are obviously either a) wanted by their existing club (meaning they are a player of some quality) or b) playing for club involved at Wembley or c) playing for a club likely to be challenging in the playoffs.
so, the fact we haven't announced signing etc since Pearson arrived is a positive to me, it means we're not signing the players on the periphery of the game.
in fact, it should make us feel less concerned, anyone who has been signed by SL clubs has been told by their old club that they are surplus to requirements, so IF we are signing anyone they are obviously either a) wanted by their existing club (meaning they are a player of some quality) or b) playing for club involved at Wembley or c) playing for a club likely to be challenging in the playoffs.
so, the fact we haven't announced signing etc since Pearson arrived is a positive to me, it means we're not signing the players on the periphery of the game.
Couldn't agree more. Richard Moore is the perfect example of this, Leeds have already announced his signing. I would have been disappointed if we had signed him, not a bad player but I like to think we will be searching for a prop/s (and a centre) who will attract some fans back to the KC.
