Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:52 am  

Airlie1984 wrote:

Is that a rumour or FACT?

Fact according to ExBifwithIcecreams

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 10:54 am  

Airlie1984 wrote:

Is that a rumour or FACT?

No thats a fact. You should know by now that he only writes b*ll*cks.

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:38 am  

RockNRolla wrote:

Wilkin was at the game last night, we could do with another back rower.

Sure, but not him.
Have a look on REDVEE and see how the saints fans rate him. We have better in our ranks in the kids coming through.

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:43 am  

think some people are forgetting that the players who are to be announced have already signed not being signed! only 3 people know the identities alledgedly, pearson, gentle and mcrea! galea to me seems an extra signing on top of the ones to be announced

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:49 am  

Sebasteeno wrote:

I ' M A M U P P E T ! ! ! ! ! !

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 11:59 am  

number 6 wrote:

think some people are forgetting that the players who are to be announced have already signed not being signed! only 3 people know the identities alledgedly, pearson, gentle and mcrea! galea to me seems an extra signing on top of the ones to be announced

galea is being signed with some of the cash saved by not signing bateman/whitehead/chase and allows us to sell tickle to widnes

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:03 pm  

Wilkin was at the game, pretty sure he was with another younger looking bloke who looked like a rugby player but I didn't recognise him... a new youngster?

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:09 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

galea is being signed with some of the cash saved by not signing bateman/whitehead/chase and allows us to sell tickle to widnes

so why would pearson tell us the players have already been signed!? unless we were never signing bateman and whitehead until the situation at the bulls was resolved.

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:24 pm  

number 6 wrote:

so why would pearson tell us the players have already been signed!? unless we were never signing bateman and whitehead until the situation at the bulls was resolved.

When did pearson say we'd signed chase, bateman or whitehead?

he said we had 7 signed, which it now transpires included pitts, watts, ellis and arundell. Add in crookes and there are only 2 we don't yet know about. He also said we were looking at a couple of others which probably included chase, holdsworth and paea at the time

Re: Rumours.... : Sun Sep 09, 2012 12:26 pm  

number 6 wrote:

think some people are forgetting that the players who are to be announced have already signed not being signed! only 3 people know the identities alledgedly, pearson, gentle and BITV BIFF, galea to me seems an extra signing on top of the ones to be announced

So bitv is in the know after all....