Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Sun Oct 17, 2010 6:44 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

How do you know we haven't approached Robinson?

Maybe we have, but if he's linked to Bradford than the deal wasn't good enough. If we're prepared to spend £175k on Westerman then there's money to spare. Forget Raviolli and Diskin and go all out for Robinson.

Just my opinion if the rumours are true .

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Sun Oct 17, 2010 6:47 pm  

He's linked to Bradford on a site as reliable as this one!

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Sun Oct 17, 2010 6:47 pm  

WormInHand wrote:

Maybe we have, but if he's linked to Bradford than the deal wasn't good enough.

Just my opinion if the rumours are true .

Linked as a rumour that anyone on this forum could create?

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Sun Oct 17, 2010 6:55 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Which 9 is closer to 10, then?

I would say roveli on a 1 year deal which seems pretty good business as he can cover hooker aswel

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Sun Oct 17, 2010 7:01 pm  

Sdtwo wrote:

Linked as a rumour that anyone on this forum could create?

Well, they've given us half an hour of fun.

(And a bit of hope, if Robinson's on the move.)

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Sun Oct 17, 2010 7:38 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Sorry if you've answered this already, Sheldon, but can you tell us a bit about Rovelli? 6 or 7? Runner or organiser? How does he compare to other HBs in Super League? Cheers for any info.

For nqc he's been poor in his stay, his better games have come at 6 when outside thurston.

When thurstons been injured and he's covered at 7 he's struggled.

This could be down to a couple of reasons.
1. He's not very good, although some would argue you don't make nearly a hundred nrl apps as a bad player.
2. Behind a poor pack in a poor team any half back, except the worlds best, would struggle.

He can organise and run.

On a one year deal he'd bring good squad cover.

Re: Transfers, rumours - version 701! : Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:02 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

For nqc he's been poor in his stay, his better games have come at 6 when outside thurston.

When thurstons been injured and he's covered at 7 he's struggled.

This could be down to a couple of reasons.
1. He's not very good, although some would argue you don't make nearly a hundred nrl apps as a bad player.
2. Behind a poor pack in a poor team any half back, except the worlds best, would struggle.

He can organise and run.

On a one year deal he'd bring good squad cover.

Cheers - sounds OK as cover then. Would he come for just a year or want 2, I wonder?

Gareth Hock : Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:11 pm  

Heard he was going to panthers but today heard FC have taken an interest. Was a good second rower imo, thoughts?

Re: Gareth Hock : Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:16 pm  

oneinthemiddle wrote:

Heard he was going to panthers but today heard FC have taken an interest. Was a good second rower imo, thoughts?

About as good as your Civoneceva thread.

Re: Gareth Hock : Sun Oct 17, 2010 9:18 pm  

ComeOnYouUll wrote:

About as good as your Civoneceva thread.

Thats what I was thinking