Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:28 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

:SHOOT:

Again played with a mixed team against a near full strength Salford, i didnt see Ford play either so thats another to add to the missing. Dour game and it was bloody freezing, Matt Gardner was about the best from today.

I thought Matt Gardner was rubbish, VM. He never ran forward with the ball once. Every time he got the ball he ran sideways, either towards the South Stand or the North.

I’ve come to the conclusion that Lee Doran in thick. He rarely played the ball properly, was warned, and yet carried on until he did it in front of his own line and was penalized, resulting in another Salford try. Perhaps a spell in the West Bank Bears under 7’s learning basic rugby skills would do him a bit of good.

Picks seemed to have borrowed Ben Blacks hands for the day. Even Gaannon wasn’t his usual self. Houghton was poor again too. We really need to get Haggy fit soon.

Our best player was Ben Kavanagh. In fact I think it’s the best I’ve seen him play in a Widnes shirt.

One thing that worries me is that our kicking game is woeful. No, it’s worse than that, we don’t have one! Salford did, and they punished us with it.

Danny Hulme looked lively and wasn’t afraid to get stuck into his share of tackling. Unfortunately, due to Coyle’s dismissal, he was playing from acting half a little more than I’d like to have seen him.

Yes, it wasn’t a full-strength side, but that was our injury back-up team and it was poor.

Child was everything I expected him to be. Thank god he’ll be in SL this season. It almost makes the Championship seem a preferable place to be.

Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:29 pm  

Child is an attention seeking **** all he wants to do is bring attention to him self he is no where near sl standard.. he is a joke.
Ruined the match last year against oldham which effectivley cost ste mac his job.

Ideally we should buy him a beer for that like XD

Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:30 pm  

Have to agree with Pepe gardner was GASH it was like watchin gavin dodd all over again

Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:31 pm  

GetThemScallyWags wrote:

Did anyone notice that both sides began playing with 13 men in the 2nd half?? A farce.

Both coaches and the ref agreed at half time that 13 v 13 would make the game more useful to the teams. Hence Widnes being allowed to bring on a replacement in the second half when a player was sinbinned.

Any idea what the penalty count was? About 40 each at a guess.

Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 6:35 pm  

Wow different opinions galore

I thought Gardner was decent in terms of his running? or am i on my own, he was looking for a gap and was trying to expose the the centre and winger and put a nice pass to Thackeray in the second half which seen him make a break. In reality the whole team was poor on the day and i seen little from anyone in the pack to give me great confidence.

Seems a total contrast from Tuesday.

Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 8:33 pm  

What worries me is that nobody has a decent kicking game?The kicks to touch only gain us 5 yards.Why cant they pump it to at least gain us 20 metres?One good kick today and that was from coyle.But on the chase he banged the guy and consequences he was sent off.For me gardner and kavanagh where the best players.Doran not playing the ball properly,pickersgill losing the ball alot,grady is not a centre,webbo and thacks poor.When will smith start scooting from dummy half?So many bad plays, and to not get a point at home was woeful.Yes near full strength salford side, but to be honest i thought salford where made to look good.

Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 9:45 pm  

What was the score?

Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:07 pm  

Faax! wrote:

What was the score?

0 - 36 to Salford

dont go there, friendlies are now a waste of time

Re: James Child : Sun Jan 24, 2010 10:59 pm  

wereutherein1987? wrote:

0 - 36 to Salford

Ouch.

To be fair it's not that bad of a score. To say you've had some off field issues, and a lot of players out injured.