Re: James Webster : Wed May 19, 2010 2:40 pm  

Chris Dalton wrote:

Stop trolling Starbug. I mean it.

Moi , a troll , never , it was just a simple honest question

Re: James Webster : Wed May 19, 2010 2:59 pm  

Starbug wrote:

Moi , a troll , never , it was just a simple honest question

No it wasn't. When a player leaves the club people tend to be a bit more reflective and either less critical or less defensive. You know this. You were trolling. Pack it in.

Re: James Webster : Wed May 19, 2010 3:07 pm  

Chris Dalton wrote:

No it wasn't. When a player leaves the club people tend to be a bit more reflective and either less critical or less defensive. You know this. You were trolling. Pack it in.

, spoilsport

Re: James Webster : Thu May 20, 2010 2:56 pm  

As i read it, Starbug was merely pointing out a contradiction from another poster.

Re: James Webster : Thu May 20, 2010 5:35 pm  

Is he any good this Webster, it's just with Leigh's dual contract signings getting called back we do have a bit of lack of depth. Just wondering if he'd be a good target for Leigh.

Re: James Webster : Thu May 20, 2010 5:56 pm  

[quote="Tom G"]Is he any good this Webster, it's just with Leigh's dual contract signings getting called back we do have a bit of lack of depth. Just wondering if he'd be a good target for Leigh.

I think you might have got the wrong end of the stick mate. Looks like Webster has retired, but if you're on about Ford, he can be flashy and looks like he could be a decent player in this division, but defence isn't great and also doesn't seem to like to pass the ball even when he has an overlap. Certainly not that great a fullback but will probably go very well at centre if someone picks him up.

Re: James Webster : Thu May 20, 2010 9:26 pm  

Sorry. I knew one had retired and one had been released. I must have got the names mixed up, I'll have to try and get our forum to discuss it. Thanks anyway . Hope to see you in Blackpool.