Re: Gannon confirmed at Fax : Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:13 pm  

littlerich wrote:

Their nightmare is at an end now though

Who in their right mind would play for the Vikings?

Someone with their RL future ahead of them maybe.

Re: Gannon confirmed at Fax : Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:15 pm  

Pepe wrote:

Someone with their RL future ahead of them maybe.

Do you mean Super League?

So none of the current squad then

Re: Gannon confirmed at Fax : Thu Oct 21, 2010 1:19 pm  

littlerich wrote:

Do you mean Super League?

So none of the current squad then

I wouldn't say none. We do have some good young 'uns coming through, and Thacks as well as a few others will no doubt feature in SL (should we get there of course)

Re: Gannon confirmed at Fax : Thu Oct 21, 2010 2:19 pm  

I'd say a decent amount tbh! Main difference between us and 'the 'champions' is that our squad players were mostly lads brought through our academy whereas there's were still 25+ experienced players who didn't make SL ours haven't got up to that shot YET!

Re: Gannon confirmed at Fax : Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:24 pm  

Yuck. I hate it when iconic players leave, never feels quite right seeing them in another shirt. Big fan of Jim.

Re: Gannon confirmed at Fax : Thu Oct 21, 2010 5:56 pm  

littlerich wrote:

Do you mean Super League?

So none of the current squad then

Bog off Richard you tart.

Re: Gannon confirmed at Fax : Thu Oct 21, 2010 6:26 pm  

Pepe wrote:

Gutted to lose Jim, without any sign of a replacement yet. I felt sorry for him and Smithy at times over the years. They have had to carry a weak pack for a long time now and, without good replacements for these two we will be screwed.


Good luck to Jim.

I could'nt agree more sir. Oh well at least we still have that lump of lard Haggarty