Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 11:42 am  

Shame on us for being the only team that have one, oh and also for him having the cheek to get this club running at an actual profit rather than personally covering millions of debt.

What a joke of a club we really are and shoudl be ashamed to rely on our major benefactor

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 2:16 pm  

lmao i have noticed many fans of clubs we may be replacing in superleague bringing this up like its some sort of crime. jealousy can be so amusing.

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 3:52 pm  

What's this all about? If it involves anyone from lobby land just ignore em.

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:19 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

What's this all about? If it involves anyone from lobby land just ignore em.

It's are soon to be SL friends

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 4:52 pm  

J20 wrote:

It's are soon to be SL friends

We'd be better off if you weren't giving some of our biggest and most hypocritical detractors ample ammunition though.

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 5:06 pm  

Like what? Putting them straight on their 'facts' they like to brand about? I stay off most of those topics but some are plain stupid as you've spotted yourself when stobart stadium sponsorship was brought up'!

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:03 pm  

J20 wrote:

Like what? Putting them straight on their 'facts' they like to brand about? I stay off most of those topics but some are plain stupid as you've spotted yourself when stobart stadium sponsorship was brought up'!

That's a challenge for you.

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:34 pm  

The laugh of it is, that most clubs have to have one (sugar daddy) to survive - including SL ones. (look at David Hughes at 'Quins and John Wilkinson at Salford - two clubs who would have been in oblivion, but for their sugar daddies)

At the end of the day, your probable success, is just a teensy bit envied, by we Leythers, or 'Fax fans. And we are undoubtedly going to be joined by the fans of 'threatened' SL teams like Castleford, and Wakefield.

Just ignore it - methinks you will be getting the last laugh!

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 7:44 pm  

Chris Dalton wrote:

We'd be better off if you weren't giving some of our biggest and most hypocritical detractors ample ammunition though.

^^This is good advice^^

Re: Sugar Daddy's : Wed Oct 13, 2010 9:00 pm  

J20 wrote:

Like what? Putting them straight on their 'facts' they like to brand about? I stay off most of those topics but some are plain stupid as you've spotted yourself when stobart stadium sponsorship was brought up'!

You started off quite well, but then went a bit awry. However certain other posters ain’t exactly covering themselves in glory either. Roy Haggerty and tb are being selective, as you say, and Roy Haggerty is showing nothing but ignorance and is putting more spin on the situation at Widnes than even the man in his avatar ever could.

Anyway, I couldn’t resist putting my two pennies worth in an all.