Re: Halifax Game : Fri Mar 19, 2010 6:23 pm  

They announced 3,286 on the tannoy last night.

Re: Halifax Game : Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:23 pm  

Starbug wrote:

So you would have played with 24 players ?

Or you could have not played , penky,Black,brannigan, royston ,patterson,tamghart and larder

Would you have done any better ?

Great isnt it, having such an abundance of quality.

Re: Halifax Game : Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:34 pm  

Greg Florimos Boots wrote:

Great isnt it, having such an abundance of quality.

Well No... no it isn't..

not unless you don't have any aspirations of reaching SL anytime soon that is.
You've ticked one box... now you want to tick the exact same box again!!!

Re: Halifax Game : Fri Mar 19, 2010 7:38 pm  

In EnemyTerritory wrote:

Well No... no it isn't..

not unless you don't have any aspirations of reaching SL anytime soon that is.
You've ticked one box... now you want to tick the exact same box again!!!

No. We need to up our attendances by being the best team in the league. Our players may or may not produce that but that is what the plan is. We need fans before we can start thinking about SL.

Re: Halifax Game : Fri Mar 19, 2010 10:12 pm  

littlerich wrote:

No. We need to up our attendances by being the best team in the league. Our players may or may not produce that but that is what the plan is. We need fans before we can start thinking about SL.

But how can any club realistically grow attendances when promotion is not decided on the field. To some degree last season any hope of SL relied upon winning the NR cup or featuring in the GF so you could say that there was something to play for. This season is different because the fortunes of Widnes/Fax/Barrow gaining a licence in 2012 will not be affected in any way by what happens on the pitch this year.

Re: Halifax Game : Fri Mar 19, 2010 11:04 pm  

Starbug wrote:

So you would have played with 24 players ?

Or you could have not played , penky,Black,brannigan, royston ,patterson,tamghart and larder

Would you have done any better ?

i was making the point that you were not the only team with members of the first team playing.

Greenwood, Nash would have been in the team for sure

Re: Halifax Game : Sat Mar 20, 2010 7:51 am  

rufustanner wrote:

But how can any club realistically grow attendances when promotion is not decided on the field. To some degree last season any hope of SL relied upon winning the NR cup or featuring in the GF so you could say that there was something to play for. This season is different because the fortunes of Widnes/Fax/Barrow gaining a licence in 2012 will not be affected in any way by what happens on the pitch this year.

That my friend - i do not know. I think the best we can hope for is 4,000 but we're way off that and i haven't a clue how the club is going to achieve that without expensive (and expansive) marketing. I think the club are hoping that if we are consistently the best team in the league the fans will turn out.

It'll take time to separate the link between SL and The Championships. When that happens, The Championship can concentrate on itself - in it's own right. Some say we won't be around then (Starbug) and others say we will.

Re: Halifax Game : Sat Mar 20, 2010 10:42 am  

In EnemyTerritory wrote:

Well No... no it isn't..

not unless you don't have any aspirations of reaching SL anytime soon that is.
You've ticked one box... now you want to tick the exact same box again!!!

As a fax fan i agree to a point with what your saying, your off field and youth activities are ahead of us, no question.
But we as a club really need to bring home the bacon and win something and get the town buzzing again. If we didn't get games against yourselves and Leigh where theres an atmosphere it would be even worse. Im sure during this season well start putting things together to move beyond what seems like ticking the same boxes. Its a good point, i've made on our own forum also many times, Tony Anderson tried the youth policy though and it cost him his job, and now we see some of those kids like Grix doing rather well, theres not a lot of patience sometimes because its a results business.

As i said before i hope we both have strong years and can meet in both finals so the fans get a taste of real rugby league, with history, passion and atmosphere. Always looked out for Widnes since the mid 80's when i started watching rugby. Good club.

Keep up the good work and i look forward to our next game.

Re: Halifax Game : Sat Mar 20, 2010 4:14 pm  

Is there any news on Haggerty. I suppose he will be having a rest anyway when the RFL veiw his attack on the Sheffield player. He will be lucky to only get 5 matches for it.

Re: Halifax Game : Sat Mar 20, 2010 5:04 pm  

Widnes if they had taken the chances and scored more points when they dominated in the opening twenty minutes could of gone on to a good win. But they let Fax get back in to the game and Fax took the chances that came there way. From that, Fax got confidence. There were stages that Widnes struggled to control Fax, as Fax were getting away with quick play the balls which gave them good momentum. Then Fax allowed Widnes back in. Both sides need to show more discipline in both attack and defence. But sure that will come.

Fax won a battle, but that will mean very little come the end of the season and Fax end up with nothing-as could easily happen. Widnes are doing things the right way and are obviously helped by SOC and so can afford to run an academy properly. I guess that is the area Widnes want to target while Fax are targetting winning something and to improve Crowds-similar probably to Barrow. Fax & Barrow are not ready for SL-Widnes are. Best of luck and am sure the next game will just be as tough to call as Thursday.