Re: Gareth Hock : Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:07 pm  

Maybe a bit harsh there but we needed him up the middle as our two prop forwards make hardly any yards,

Re: Gareth Hock : Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:41 pm  

^

Pretty much. I thought he was anonymous in the 1st half. Need him on a run of games in the side so he can show what he can do. Only seen him in fits and starts.

Re: Gareth Hock : Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:40 am  

Redchemic wrote:

^

Pretty much. I thought he was anonymous in the 1st half. Need him on a run of games in the side so he can show what he can do. Only seen him in fits and starts.

Having word with match officials has not assisted his appearances, and has probably cost us points.

Re: Gareth Hock : Tue Jun 18, 2013 7:37 am  

I was really excited when we signed Hock and thought he'd do a great job for us this season. Now I'm pretty disappointed. He's only shown his best on very rare occasions and missing games has cost us. I just hope he can get stuck in for the rest of the season and give us something to remember him by. Great performances and not poor discipline.

Re: Gareth Hock : Tue Jun 18, 2013 9:39 am  

OFFTHECUFF wrote:

I think he mis read your post, as I think he was thinking this season.Not sure what Salfords average this year, as not paid much attention, due to the Kou Kou Clown in charge.

3096 so far

Re: Gareth Hock : Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:33 am  

Fordy wrote:

3096 so far

Not so great mate but slightly better than London or similar.

Re: Gareth Hock : Tue Jun 18, 2013 10:49 am  

Leeds 14993
Wigan 14885
Hull FC 12177
St. Helens 10919
Warrington 10430
Bradford 9064
Wakefield 7830
Catalan 7545
Hull KR 7383
Hudderfield 6268
Widnes 6247
Castleford 5975
Salford 3128
London 2231

That the average crowd up to but not including Leeds vs Widnes lastnight

Re: Gareth Hock : Tue Jun 18, 2013 1:13 pm  

J20 wrote:

He says a lot of things...

Though if this move happened I honestly wouldn't be too shocked but last Paramtta statement said Hock's personal issues were being sorted and he was still planning to join them next season.

Indeed.. in fact hadn't the Salford Circus Reds sent a grovelling apology letter to Paramatta promising not to attempt to sign Hock?

Re: Gareth Hock : Tue Jun 18, 2013 4:55 pm  

Dr Chim Richalds wrote:

Indeed.. in fact hadn't the Salford Circus Reds sent a grovelling apology letter to Paramatta promising not to attempt to sign Hock?

Pretty sure I read Koukash himself named as sending that letter.

Hock hasn't been everything we had hoped for, hope we don't have to pay for ban periods?!!
Mind you, Brown hasn't really shone either. Makes me wonder if it's the effect of players around them though - if they got better balls could they do more with it maybe?

One thing for sure is that if I was Paramatta I would be hoping to see more from Hock this season!

Re: Gareth Hock : Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:18 pm  

Steken wrote:

Pretty sure I read Koukash himself named as sending that letter.

Hock hasn't been everything we had hoped for, hope we don't have to pay for ban periods?!!
Mind you, Brown hasn't really shone either. Makes me wonder if it's the effect of players around them though - if they got better balls could they do more with it maybe?

One thing for sure is that if I was Paramatta I would be hoping to see more from Hock this season!

Paramattas last press press release said if Salford want hock they will have to buy out his contract with us. Now tell me why would they release a statement like that if there was anything in it.