Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:28 pm  

GetThemScallyWags wrote:

And out of the duelling banjo playing depths of inbred Yorkshire comes another ill informed troll.....

We've already tried explaining to you the facts about the franchise process which you seem blissfully ignorant of. We've already satisfied the on field criteria in winning the 'tin pot' trophy as you call it. I know it's difficult for an inbred like yourself to understand but the main point of the franchise has nothing to do with competitiveness but you wouldn't know that because Wakefield barely scrape through in any of those other criteria and fail even more when it comes to that crumbling stadium of yours and your incredibly bad looking finances.

Keep making fools of yourselves. You've both come on here and launched unprovoked diatribes of bullshit at us without any good reason whatsoever other than to try and kid yourselves into thinking you're going to survive the next round of franchises no problem.

Here we go another one that has no real argument so he resorts to name calling. If you don't like an opposing opinion I suggest you stay away from forums.

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:32 pm  

Soldierboy wrote:

I know if wakefield where in national league as long as widnes you be suffering more now.So jog on.

We have done our time in the NL mate and we put it together on the field and got promoted, something which Widnes seem incapable of doing.

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:35 pm  

Lock it and ban these morons.

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:36 pm  

dehell i dont see what your trying to achieve in all this, your only making yourself look pathetic. The decision wont be made by you or any of us so it's pointless going on. The current rules as they are now suggest Wakefield are one of a number of clubs that could drop down are your going to have to deal with that if it happens.


Widnes will always be a bigger club than Wakefield.

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:40 pm  

GetThemScallyWags wrote:

How can you dismiss someone's opinion while claiming an opinion of your own as fact? I can't wait for the school holidays to be over and trolls like you won't have so much time on their hands...

Our recent financial history has nothing to do with any current state of affairs so to use it in any trollfest just shows how weak minded you are...

I've stated both opinions (barrow before widnes) and facts (franchise points).

Regarding our tax debt (or ex debt) that has nothing to do with franchise points but it doesn't stop you bringing it up as a way backing your ridiculously weak opinion up.

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:41 pm  

GetThemScallyWags wrote:

Lock it and ban these morons.

Sounds like someone can't handle the truth

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:46 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Sounds like someone can't handle the truth

What truth? your getting boring and keep getting away from the fact that your own club is in difficulty.

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:50 pm  

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 9:54 pm
Last visited: Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:45 pm
Total posts: 602
[0.06% of all posts / 0.41 posts per day]
Search user’s posts
Most active forum: Castleford Tigers
[ 138 Posts / 22.92% of user’s posts ]
Most active topic: Widnes before Barrow?
[ 30 Posts / 4.98% of user’s posts ]


This explains a lot.

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 1:59 pm  

deeHell wrote:

Sounds like someone can't handle the mindless wittering of a boring and repetitive troll

Go back to troll school.

Re: Widnes before Barrow? : Fri Jan 01, 2010 2:07 pm  

If your a bigger club than us how come were in the ELITE division and your in CRAPPY division.1