Re: Gutted but a good performance : Mon Feb 11, 2013 10:15 pm  

Albion wrote:

:lol: that is hilarious! That's an embarrassing overreaction, for a mod. Seriously, I worry for your heart getting all stressed like that over nothing.

Saints were winning the ruck and were dominating the tackle, therefore the ptb was slower; it was good play from Saints. Hudds did it to us last week, they physically dominated the floor so we had a slow ptb.

It wasn't good play by Saints, it was poop, and you were poop and could only beat us when we had 11 on the field thanks to a chickenshit decision by a referee out of his depth. Dominating the ruck is called holding down by most teams and they aren't usually allowed to get away with it. It's negative, boring tactics and you're going to get seriously shown up by teams like the wire and wigan and after yesterday I sincerely hope you do.

Just because I'm a mod does not mean I cannot show emotion for the team I care about. That's idiotic.

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Mon Feb 11, 2013 11:22 pm  

Warrington Wolf wrote:

I got told from Saints fans in work today that Clarke ran in from 20 yards. No such thing. You have been had off by Childs big style.

It looks like Saints fans idea of 20 yards are the same as their players and James Childs interpretation of the 10 metre rule as well ;

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Tue Feb 12, 2013 2:49 am  

I'm personally gutted that Paul Wellens missed out on his BAFTA award. He'd earned it, he'd worked for it, and he was conned out of it by Daniel Bloody Day Bloody Lewis.

I mean, I know he's a fantastic actor, and I know he has countless people believing every performance he puts on, and I know he's been at the game for a long long time, however Day Lewis is also very very good at acting.

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Tue Feb 12, 2013 7:25 am  

Winning the ruck and dominating the tackle is a rather nice way of saying spoiling tactics.

I'd call it deliberately and illegally slowing our play of the ball and then having the cheek to appeal whenever we attempted it. I think we got a lesson in the dark arts to be honest.

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Tue Feb 12, 2013 4:27 pm  

Just an initial point on the 'team warning' I know it's up to the refs discretion but he gave us the 'signal' with 5 mins left of the first half so if he's let that go on for 25 (game) minutes then I'd be surprised... Ok, maybe not!

Outstanding effort by all the Widnes boys. Shame about the red as that was a belting game really. Can't remember us being involved in a tighter struggle in defensive terms apart from in atrocious conditions etc.

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:41 pm  

Well this MOD better than the Warrington Mods as they ban you if disagree with them.

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Wed Feb 13, 2013 8:41 pm  

Well this MOD better than the Warrington Mods as they ban you if disagree with them.

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Wed Feb 13, 2013 11:15 pm  

Widnes have taken a huge step backwards this season. You ran us much closer last year when we could only win wuth the two cheating linesmen.

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Thu Feb 14, 2013 5:46 am  

OFFTHECUFF wrote:

Well this MOD better than the Warrington Mods as they ban you if disagree with them.

Re: Gutted but a good performance : Thu Feb 14, 2013 7:38 am  

One eyed monster wrote:

Widnes have taken a huge step backwards this season. You ran us much closer last year when we could only win wuth the two cheating linesmen.

What planet you on. :CRAZY: