: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:41 pm  

Gary High wrote:

Point is that he was sin binned for striking - 3 times ? Bracek is on a striking charge so why isn't Gannon - that is all I am saying.

Bracek wasn't sin binned for his offence. We have laws that ensure you are not punished for the same offence twice unless the punishment was deemed not to be sufficient.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:44 pm  

Alex J wrote:

Bracek wasn't sin binned for his offence. We have laws that ensure you are not punished for the same offence twice unless the punishment was deemed not to be sufficient.

Exactly, Gannon served his punishment by getting binned.

Bracek commited a shocking high tackle and ran in throwing haymakers later in the game.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:53 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

Exactly, Gannon served his punishment by getting binned.

Bracek commited a shocking high tackle and ran in throwing haymakers later in the game.

Sin bin sufficient ?? Absolute rubbish ! Gannon should have been shown a straight red card and Brett correctly shown yellow for retaliation.

Bracek was cited by Hewer in his report and if it was deemed serious enough to take note of, then Hewer should have grown a pair & binned him during the game.

Sulking Vikingman, me ? Not at all. I have never once said Widnes never deserved their win.

Even the most diehard cannot be serious by thinking Gannon should not be on a charge.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:54 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

And look who's sulking now

Still like you said it will be all different when we go Craven park, i will be able to pee all over my shoes and have a rat burger.

But we have never gone bust old lad................Oh yes and they are our toilets and our rat burgers, not the Councils

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:54 pm  

Gary High wrote:

Sin bin sufficient ?? Absolute rubbish ! Gannon should have been shown a straight red card and Brett correctly shown yellow for retaliation.

Bracek was cited by Hewer in his report and if it was deemed serious enough to take note of, then Hewer should have grown a pair & binned him during the game.

Sulking Vikingman, me ? Not at all. I have never once said Widnes never deserved their win.

Even the most diehard cannot be serious by thinking Gannon should not be on a charge.

Red card for a bit of biff? I think you'd be better trying another sport, like curling or something.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:57 pm  

Gary High wrote:

But we have never gone bust old lad................Oh yes and they are our toilets and our rat burgers, not the Councils

I think i might have to drag the sour grapes out for you pal.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:58 pm  

Chris Dalton wrote:

Red card for a bit of biff? I think you'd be better trying another sport, like curling or something.

Jesus you lot have an answer for everything.

Its all about comparisons. I have seen players sent off loads of times for what Gannon did. At the end of the day, red card, yellow card or no card (as in Braceks case) Gannon should be on a charge. The RFL have been very inconsistent with their citing on this game. The RFL have missed 1 or 2 other players who are lucky not to be on a charge and I am not just reffering to Widnes players.

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:59 pm  

Gary High wrote:

But we have never gone bust old lad................Oh yes and they are our toilets and our rat burgers, not the Councils

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:59 pm  

Well done Terry O'connor http://www.barrowrlfc.com/barrow_rugby_ ... newsID=510

Well done Terry O'connor http://www.barrowrlfc.com/barrow_rugby_ ... newsID=510

: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:59 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

I think i might have to drag the sour grapes out for you pal.

Erm no mate, that will be you lot forever going on about missing out last time round.