Re: JAMES RULE : Tue Oct 09, 2012 12:46 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

It wasn't his decision to do that.

Whose was it VM? BOC?

Re: JAMES RULE : Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:01 pm  

Dr Chim Richalds wrote:

Whose was it VM? BOC?

Dont want to name names bud but it was discussed in advance before rule joined Widnes, that I do know.

I dont see what all the fuss is myself, these aren't earth shattering changes by any means.

Re: JAMES RULE : Tue Oct 09, 2012 2:34 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

Dont want to name names bud but it was discussed in advance before rule joined Widnes, that I do know.

I dont see what all the fuss is myself, these aren't earth shattering changes by any means.

Nope, it certainly could have come out better but a £2 a month increase on monthly payments only with tbh a justifiable reason is understandable in that case IMO.