Who would you rather replace : Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:39 pm  

>It is 100% nailed on you will be in SL come 2012, this is fact.

who would you most rather you replace?

(out of currently feasable clubs)

...and why?

: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:41 pm  

Sod off troll boy.

: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm  

-VIKINGMAN- wrote:

Sod off troll boy.

eh

: Sat Aug 08, 2009 12:47 am  

What he said.

Re: Who would you rather replace : Sat Aug 08, 2009 8:32 am  

Jack_The_Lad wrote:

>It is 100% nailed on you will be in SL come 2012, this is fact.

Evidence please.

: Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:40 am  

Am playing!1 lol.

Salford! At least Celtic are new and something different, plus it's the RFL that does their lying!

Salford are prob most horrible club in the game, lie constantly, take other clubs youngsters yet then live on tele cast them as their own! For an 80yr club in Manchester area their attendances are pitiful!


Etc...

: Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:06 pm  

J20 wrote:

Am playing!1 lol.

Salford! At least Celtic are new and something different, plus it's the RFL that does their lying!

Salford are prob most horrible club in the game, lie constantly, take other clubs youngsters yet then live on tele cast them as their own! For an 80yr club in Manchester area their attendances are pitiful!


Etc...

Some fair points there about Salford. You could have mentioned the fact that their town is considered a joke by people who come from Manchester (I know! I have in-laws who are Mancs), and that many of their fans look as though a bath would be a good idea.
BUT! They're a real rugby league club with a great tradition. They play in one of only three historic Lancashire cities (the only one with two professional rugby league clubs as Swinton is in Salford), have given the world Christopher Ecceleston, Jason Manford and Al Reed and Albert Finney. Bridgend doesn't compare!

Re: Who would you rather replace : Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:14 pm  

Jack_The_Lad wrote:

>It is 100% nailed on you will be in SL come 2012, this is fact.

who would you most rather you replace?

(out of currently feasable clubs)

...and why?

please tell me why it is a certainty for them to get in in 2012.

Re: Who would you rather replace : Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:21 pm  

faxtastic wrote:

please tell me why it is a certainty for them to get in in 2012.

unless they go bust (yeah right), and providing 2 clubs go up, i think it is

Far and away the most obvious choice, for reasons we all know

The biggest being the stick the rfl got for not sticking them in last time round

: Sat Aug 08, 2009 10:22 pm  

Sod these two. I'd get rid of Wakefield. They were only let in as they promised ground improvements that they never produced. Because of this Hunslet and Dewsbury were not allowed into Super League as they too made promises as the RFL now wanted ground improvements in advance. Move on to the licences and again Wakefield lie, this time about a new ground and again are believed as once again the RFL was believing anything they were told.