Jamie Leahy : Sun Jun 27, 2010 5:13 pm  

Trawl ours and every other forum and you will see many posts from me that are fairly consistent.
viz:- Jamie Leahy is not fit for purpose. He should NOT be reffing at our level and should NOT have the opportunity to ruin games with his endless stopping of the game.

Yes - Johnny G scored a try which was embarrassing. Even Johnny looked baffled! Everyone in the ground could see a Fev knock on but Leahy - hopeless.

Did it effect the result - well of course it did. But I could also point to some decisions going Widnes's way too. On balance I thought Fev were the better team - just! But Leahy???? He's just sheeeite!

Re: Jamie Leahy : Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:38 pm  

Sorry but i thought 8 points difference flattered widnes, not 1 clean line break in 80 mins from yourselves and a lot of missed tackles, i felt fev kept you at arms length and always looked like scoring moments following a widnes effort

granted you took your chances but it took a dodgy sin binning and for Fev to be down to 12 to get you on your way, a bit like the away fixture was

however it was a good game, thought you brought a decent following despite the time change

Re: Jamie Leahy : Sun Jun 27, 2010 6:52 pm  

It was more a post about Leahy Xri. He IS SHEEITE!!!!
But regardless of his weird decisions and annoying spoiling pedantic nature which has spoiled many a game for the paying public, I agree, we were just the better team. But just to ask, what did you think of the Grayshon try?

Re: Jamie Leahy : Sun Jun 27, 2010 7:57 pm  

Rotherham Fev Fan wrote:

It was more a post about Leahy Xri. He IS SHEEITE!!!!
But regardless of his weird decisions and annoying spoiling pedantic nature which has spoiled many a game for the paying public, I agree, we were just the better team. But just to ask, what did you think of the Grayshon try?

This a fev message board? To be honest i watched the england game so cant comment.Widnes are missing a scrumhalf now, and with so many players used this year their is no continuity.I think we are starting to improve slowly and will make the top 6.

Re: Jamie Leahy : Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:06 pm  

Fevxr2i wrote:

thought you brought a decent following despite the time change

It turns out many fans who made the journey didn't get there due to an incident on the M62 near Huddersfield, too.

Re: Jamie Leahy : Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:06 pm  

Rotherham Fev Fan wrote:

It was more a post about Leahy Xri. He IS SHEEITE!!!!

maybe, but there arent any other threads about todays game current

Re: Jamie Leahy : Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:21 pm  

Oddly enough he used to be a pretty good ref. Heaven knows what has happened to him - maybe pee'd off that Child got an SL spot and he didnt? After our last game he spent some time in Championship 1 for getting the rules wrong and handing Fev the drop goal chance. And today, another close game that could have gone either way thanks to some odd decisions. (I didn't seem much wrong with our disallowed try and another certain try chalked off for a forward pass that seemed ok).

Problem is, are there lots of great young refs coming up through the ranks at the moment?

Still, despite that, a good, exciting game of RL between two well matched teams - I think the difference is that you are slightly better coached than we are. We do lack organisation and co-ordination at times, but to give Cullen the benefit of the doubt that could be because we can't seem to put the same team on the pitch two weeks running because of injuries. And we lack a quality scrum half to take the team around the pitch. Still, plenty of positives for us to take from today.

Re: Jamie Leahy : Sun Jun 27, 2010 8:59 pm  

The Unknown Chemic wrote:

Oddly enough he used to be a pretty good ref. Heaven knows what has happened to him - maybe pee'd off that Child got an SL spot and he didnt? After our last game he spent some time in Championship 1 for getting the rules wrong and handing Fev the drop goal chance. And today, another close game that could have gone either way thanks to some odd decisions. (I didn't seem much wrong with our disallowed try and another certain try chalked off for a forward pass that seemed ok).

Problem is, are there lots of great young refs coming up through the ranks at the moment?

Still, despite that, a good, exciting game of RL between two well matched teams - I think the difference is that you are slightly better coached than we are. We do lack organisation and co-ordination at times, but to give Cullen the benefit of the doubt that could be because we can't seem to put the same team on the pitch two weeks running because of injuries. And we lack a quality scrum half to take the team around the pitch. Still, plenty of positives for us to take from today.

Widnes played well today and were on the wrong end off some tough decisions, Fev probably just deserved to edge a tough game however. As for the incident regards the drop goal at yours, well i watched that game on DVD and the ref in my opinion got that one right. You packed down without a loose and he pulled the scrum up and told the scrum half, so they packed down again, and yet again there was no loose and no one even making there way to the scrum. School boy stuff, how many times does a team need telling to get a loose in the scrum.

Re: Jamie Leahy : Mon Jun 28, 2010 6:41 am  

At the Stobart Widnes were rightly penalised for offside on one occasion (after a kick offside players failed to give 10 metres to the Fev reciever) but the twerp said the penalty should be taken from where the kick was taken!

Re: Jamie Leahy : Mon Jun 28, 2010 7:50 am  

yossarian wrote:

At the Stobart Widnes were rightly penalised for offside on one occasion (after a kick offside players failed to give 10 metres to the Fev reciever) but the twerp said the penalty should be taken from where the kick was taken!

Which is the decision I was referring to which cost us 40 meteres (and Mr Leahey a stint in Champ 1), not the packing at the scrum which was just down to the players and another example of lack of organisation.