: Fri May 15, 2009 6:25 pm  

Big Spender wrote:

And you base this on what ?

The fact that he's an aussie that didn't play first grade NRL before coming here blah blah etc.

Apparently it doesn't matter how well you play; once you've been labelled by the clueless - thats that.

: Fri May 15, 2009 6:27 pm  

reddan wrote:

Sure.

Thats poor even for you. Count all my posts on Rovers forum compared to FC one if your sad enough.

: Fri May 15, 2009 6:28 pm  

Alphabetti Spaghetti Go! wrote:

Who is "we" ?

You deciding to change the topic because you realised you made a mistake.

: Fri May 15, 2009 10:00 pm  

pmarrow wrote:

Thats poor even for you.

Yet you said the same yourself. Oh, and hello again...

: Fri May 15, 2009 10:03 pm  

hull smallears wrote:

Yep average, very very average

What does that make your pack of plodders then?

: Sat May 16, 2009 1:24 am  

hull smallears wrote:

Lovegrove is average at best

Well thank your lucky stars you have Cusack then mate.

: Sat May 16, 2009 3:48 am  

reddan wrote:

Yet you said the same yourself. Oh, and hello again...

You were entitled to say it was poor for me too.

: Sat May 16, 2009 10:01 am  

Gavin Miller - Legend wrote:

Well thank your lucky stars you have Cusack then mate.

our pack are cack!

: Sat May 16, 2009 1:44 pm  

rover49 wrote:

Good to have these players in tour squads, but when you pick your starting 17 for a test match you want the best you have in their specialist positions, Horne is not as good a full back as Briscoe or Wellens. Stick him on the bench and you might be right.

Call me old fashioned, but a test side should have a fullback, scrum half and hooker who ARE full backs, scrum halves and hookers.

Horne might not be as good full back as Birscoe thats why in my origional post i put Lee Smith as full back

You need someone to cover the backs on the bench and someone with the ability LIKE horne to cover 1-7 would be a great assest

I would ideally have Leon Pryce on the bench but i can't think of a better 6