Full backs : Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:21 pm  

As the above really it needs sorting out quickly I reckon,so who we got in mined?

It's the biggest hole we need to fill so names of who we wud like to see their

Re: Full backs : Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:26 pm  

Ksmith3537 wrote:

As the above really it needs sorting out quickly I reckon,so who we got in mined?

It's the biggest hole we need to fill so names of who we wud like to see their

Your behind the times, Craig Hall is full back.


But with Travis being banned we do need cover. . .Save 'Disco' hodgson?

Re: Full backs : Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:33 pm  

I can't see that , hes not steady enough in my view but we will see

Re: Full backs : Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:49 pm  

Ksmith3537 wrote:

I can't see that , hes not steady enough in my view but we will see

It was announced at the POTY awards, and I think Craig will do a far better job than Mcdonnell; for starters Craig needs to be more involved and in this role he will be. Craig is an exciting runner of the ball and has an eye for an opening. As for being a classic full back, thats not the case these days but Craig isn't a bad defensive player and I feel his positional play has improved since he joined Rovers.

Re: Full backs : Thu Oct 18, 2012 8:54 pm  

Paul T - HKR wrote:

It was announced at the POTY awards, and I think Craig will do a far better job than Mcdonnell (no he wont,as we shall probably see); for starters Craig needs to be more involved and in this role he will be. Craig is an exciting runner of the ball and has an eye for an opening. As for being a classic full back, thats not the case these days but Craig isn't a bad defensive player and I feel his positional play has improved since he joined Rovers (100% yes .

Re: Full backs : Thu Oct 18, 2012 9:44 pm  

Paul T - HKR wrote:

Your behind the times, Craig Hall is full back.


But with Travis being banned we do need cover. . .Save 'Disco' hodgson?

I dont think Hall will be full back next season, at least thats what we heard last Friday night while at the opening of the new shop, we were speaking to one of the directors who said, Rovers were still looking to sign a fullback for next season as well as a prop, i'm pretty sure he also said a second row was on the list.

Re: Full backs : Fri Oct 19, 2012 7:31 am  

Seventies red wrote:

I dont think Hall will be full back next season, at least thats what we heard last Friday night while at the opening of the new shop, we were speaking to one of the directors who said, Rovers were still looking to sign a fullback for next season as well as a prop, i'm pretty sure he also said a second row was on the list.

I spoke to Stan and Bonesy, and they said Rovers were looking for 'cover' at full back and an experienced prop. They said Rovers were in talks with a player but wouldn't say who, and then CS joined us and the conversation quickly moved on

I did ask CS if Dobbo was in his plans for next season, and he said emphatically 'too right!'.

Re: Full backs : Fri Oct 19, 2012 8:29 am  

Hall's not a FB.

Re: Full backs : Fri Oct 19, 2012 10:00 am  

Paul T - HKR wrote:

I spoke to Stan and Bonesy, and they said Rovers were looking for 'cover' at full back and an experienced prop. They said Rovers were in talks with a player but wouldn't say who, and then CS joined us and the conversation quickly moved on

I did ask CS if Dobbo was in his plans for next season, and he said emphatically 'too right!'.

Of course the kitman is central to all Rovers player negotiations...and Sandercock does nothing without his say so...

Re: Full backs : Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:22 am  

Guardian wrote:

Of course the kitman is central to all Rovers player negotiations...and Sandercock does nothing without his say so...

Absolutely