: Wed May 06, 2009 3:11 pm  

Fancy us in this one.

24-16

: Wed May 06, 2009 3:58 pm  

I think if we turn up like we did against saints, we will beat you confortably, I however think it will be a really close game and either team could win it going into the last 10 minutes. It will be a brilliant game.

If I had to make a guess I would say 34-26 to us as we are both pretty free scoring.

: Wed May 06, 2009 4:00 pm  

Does that mean you're assuming you won't turn up like you did against Saints?

Hope you're right.

: Wed May 06, 2009 4:11 pm  

id say 10-0 rovers in first half then a 18-16 win for rovers to go top of the league

: Wed May 06, 2009 4:42 pm  

phil webbo wrote:

No he hasn't, that was the first win by either Hull team at the stoop

He means 2 out of 3 at JJB

: Wed May 06, 2009 4:49 pm  

Think Wigan will be on form IF we beat Wakefield this weekend.

If not then I'd say its open to anyone.

I'm going for a 36-24 win in Wigan's favor

: Wed May 06, 2009 6:31 pm  

roversmad wrote:

He means 2 out of 3 at JJB

It was quite confusing though

: Wed May 06, 2009 9:24 pm  

phil webbo wrote:

:oops: It was quite confusing though

Its these heady heights we've reached we don't know if we are coming or going

: Thu May 07, 2009 9:33 am  

odemwingie wrote:

I think if we turn up like we did against saints, we will beat you confortably, I however think it will be a really close game and either team could win it going into the last 10 minutes. It will be a brilliant game.

If I had to make a guess I would say 34-26 to us as we are both pretty free scoring.

The game vs saints on Saturday was a good performance & great to watch. We had a load of saints followers sat around us at Murrayfield, who weren’t best pleased with how the game was going to say the least!

Think this game could go either way, with plenty of points in it – looking forward to it (first Fri night game for us in a while too & we have x3 within 4 weeks!)

: Thu May 07, 2009 12:45 pm  

roversmad wrote:

He means 2 out of 3 at JJB

I think he's using what is called as 'wit.'