: Fri May 15, 2009 12:56 pm  

DORIAN J ASQUITH wrote:

No simply becasue Smith offers far more in attack than Briscoe and Carvell is a liabilty will the amount of penalties and injuries he has

I also said someone like R Horne if you could read properely: a player who can cover any position in the back line - ideally i would put leyon pryce on the bench and start with a different stand off

Good to have these players in tour squads, but when you pick your starting 17 for a test match you want the best you have in their specialist positions, Horne is not as good a full back as Briscoe or Wellens. Stick him on the bench and you might be right.

Call me old fashioned, but a test side should have a fullback, scrum half and hooker who ARE full backs, scrum halves and hookers.

: Fri May 15, 2009 2:04 pm  

pmarrow wrote:

Hardly spend half my life on your forum.

No you spend it sending dummy spats via the pm system, like this one you sent me.

Think your clever do you daft lad.

Learn to use photoshop nugget.

I think I must have upset someone there

I googled Photoshop nugget, and it just said do you mean Photoshop, If anyone knows how to use a photoshop nugget, please let me know as I have to learn how to use one

: Fri May 15, 2009 2:08 pm  

BTW try reading this.
2.1. Comments that are wholly designed to upset or cause distress to other members are prohibited on this site.
* We will not tolerate threatening or abusive behaviour. Anyone who is found guilty of acting this way towards any member risks being banned from RLFANS.
* Racist, homophobic, or similarly offensive content is unacceptable.
* This includes messages sent via the Private Message system.
* Where a user wishes to keep their identity private this should be respected.

Just in case you're unsure I've highlighted it for you

: Fri May 15, 2009 2:10 pm  

Lets get back on topic please.

: Fri May 15, 2009 3:25 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

Not surprising considering they have both been injured.

As has Lovegrove.
So what is your point?

: Fri May 15, 2009 5:05 pm  

Roverswall wrote:

As has Lovegrove.
So what is your point?

Lovegrove is average at best

: Fri May 15, 2009 5:11 pm  

hull smallears wrote:

Lovegrove is average at best

And you base this on what ?

: Fri May 15, 2009 5:12 pm  

Big Spender wrote:

And you base this on what ?

Him being very average.

: Fri May 15, 2009 5:17 pm  

hull smallears wrote:

Him being very average.

So its basically a detailed statistical analysis on an opposition player you watch regularly then.

: Fri May 15, 2009 5:31 pm  

Big Spender wrote:

So its basically a detailed statistical analysis on an opposition player you watch regularly then.

Yep average, very very average