Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:20 pm  

ragstorm wrote:

Aye but werent all championship teams part time last year and generally ran out of steam vs sl teams in the last 20 or so minutes. Its a more level playing field this year and with the cap increasing for championship teams next season it will be even closer.
Any team would struggle without experienced halves and with campese out for so long its made kelly even more crucial to hkr

No Bradford and Leigh were full time last year as well

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:41 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

He'd take you to the cleaners at a tribunal

You can only sue for actual lost in employment law. Which I would think would be the remaining wages.

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 6:43 pm  

Bal wrote:

You can only sue for actual lost in employment law. Which I would think would be the remaining wages.

So £150k + then

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 7:17 pm  

the reason he might had been late return back to rovers could be due to sorting out a deal for nxt season in oz (thats if hes allowed to speak to other clubs ???

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 7:30 pm  

How late was he?

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 8:08 pm  

3 days and 15 pint

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:54 pm  

craig hkr wrote:

3 days and 15 pint

pint or kilos?

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 9:57 pm  

Can't we suspend Tilse instead?

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 10:59 pm  

Gallanteer wrote:

Can't we suspend Tilse instead?

Yeah because it was all his fault today wasn't it

Re: Albert Kelly : Sat Sep 03, 2016 11:42 pm  

fun time frankie wrote:

Yeah because it was all his fault today wasn't it

Not totally, but largely (pun intended), yes.