Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:31 am  

brigarmy wrote:

wildboars 40 v bamber bridge 28 worse performance of the season for us didnt play well and didnt make wildboars work at all to much dropped ball and too many pens made lots of easy yards we battled to the end but a very poor performance from us,credit wildboars they played well and deserved the win,hope the lad who got carried of at end of the game is ok

It was a very sloppy game from the off, dont think either team played as well as we hoped with a very stop start game, as is always the case with that certain ref in charge.

Down to have West Bank at weekend have they been playing? Been a very stop start season which we have been struggling from early on with, even giving one game way this season which isnt good enough (Apologies to Heysham). Just hope next season once everyone has a break the season will be a little bit more settled and run more smoothly.

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Tue Aug 14, 2012 4:15 pm  

you never know with widnes west bank if they are going turn up but if they dnt turn up do you the wildboars want to come to our place??/

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:10 pm  

brigarmy wrote:

bamber bridge 24 - warrington wizard 0 been informed thay are not comimg to play us there going to play in the merit league play offs so no fixture getting naffed of with this league,

Surely that can't take priority over a league fixture!!!!!

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Wed Aug 15, 2012 3:17 pm  

brigarmy wrote:

i have to disagree with you wirejb if teams cnt get a 2nd team they shouldnt have 2 teams if we wanted to play all the 1st teams we would of asked to go in a higher league,

I don't think it is necessarily you can't get a 2nd team, this is the first time we have run a 2nd team and what we have found that when lads get injured, go away, suspended etc for either team it basically stretches the 2nd team, so as the season has gone on our 2nds have struggled more and more, you have a squad of open age players there isn't a distinction between them although players will predominately play for one side or the other with some players who float back and to.

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Sat Aug 18, 2012 3:53 pm  

Bank Quay 32 - Ulverston 38
Hindpool 28 - Heysham 18

2 great results !!

Some massive fixtures coming up...despite the stop start season its going to be a cracking finish!

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Mon Aug 20, 2012 12:46 pm  

Gary High wrote:

Bank Quay 32 - Ulverston 38
Hindpool 28 - Heysham 18

2 great results !!

Some massive fixtures coming up...despite the stop start season its going to be a cracking finish!

Disappointing to lose the game but really could have gone either way, they must love us will rue dropping two over the line!!

A couple of weeks off so hopefully a few bodies back on board for the last few games.

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Mon Aug 20, 2012 1:42 pm  

Who do you have still to play wirejb?

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Mon Aug 20, 2012 4:34 pm  

Here mate http://www.northwestrugbyleague.co.uk/club/11395

Here mate http://www.northwestrugbyleague.co.uk/club/11395

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:34 pm  

gjj23 wrote:

Who do you have still to play wirejb?

Bamber Bridge
Heysham Atoms
Cadishead
Blackbrook A

Re: NWML Division 3 Thread 2012 : Tue Aug 21, 2012 4:21 pm  

we bamber bridge are miles away from finishing our season it now goes into the middle of nov which is a joke we will run the risk of the weather and council calling the pitch of,all year we have had teams ask to move games and then they ring david lowe and he goes ok we need a free weeknd in sept as we are all away,