: Sat Sep 12, 2009 1:38 pm  

It is possible to play in NL2 with PART TIME /SEMI PRO PLAYERS. Are these players in question professional at that time? thats for the RFL and the UKBA to decide.

All that we know for certian is that their visas for the 2008 and 2009 season were VALID AND CORRECT.

Before anyone else makes any spurious accussations , GET THE FACTS RIGHT!

: Sat Sep 12, 2009 3:48 pm  

cardiffcrusaderrob wrote:

It is possible to play in NL2 with PART TIME /SEMI PRO PLAYERS. Are these players in question professional at that time? thats for the RFL and the UKBA to decide.

All that we know for certian is that their visas for the 2008 and 2009 season were VALID AND CORRECT.

Before anyone else makes any spurious accussations , GET THE FACTS RIGHT!

2009 yes , 2008 no

Most NL 1 / Championship players are part time / semi pro players , ie they get paid to play RL part time , but still have full time occupations

No different to 2000,2001,2002,2003 and so on

: Sat Sep 12, 2009 5:37 pm  

Starbug wrote:

Between 2005 and nov 2008 the visas they had were not the correct ones

Apostrophes denote the possessive or missing letters.
However it never denotes the plural.

You should know better, for shame.

: Sun Sep 13, 2009 7:44 am  

hudd giants wrote:

you sould not even be in the league get widnes or halifax in

Neither would bring ANYTHING to SL.

: Sun Sep 13, 2009 8:42 am  

Starbug,
sorry mate but your figures are not to be relied upon since you earlier claimed the 6's visas were wrong in 2005 when they hadn't even signed for us.

: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:46 pm  

Grendel wrote:

Starbug,
sorry mate but your figures are not to be relied upon since you earlier claimed the 6's visas were wrong in 2005 when they hadn't even signed for us.

Stop clutching at straws

: Sun Sep 13, 2009 12:57 pm  

Leaguefan wrote:

Neither would bring ANYTHING to SL.

What do you mean?

Surely their average attendances of 54,238, and their free-flowing brand of rugby, with their loyal (and friendly, open-minded) fans. They'd be a HIT, let em in.

: Sun Sep 13, 2009 2:35 pm  

belgianxiii wrote:

Apostrophes denote the possessive or missing letters.
However it never denotes the plural.

You should know better, for shame.

Thanks for the english lesson

It's a while since I had one of those

: Sun Sep 13, 2009 3:58 pm  

ajhcrusader wrote:

What do you mean?

Surely their average attendances of 54,238, and their free-flowing brand of rugby, with their loyal (and friendly, open-minded) fans. They'd be a HIT, let em in.

Oh I had forgotten about that.

I have to admit that their inclusion is an absolute must


P.S.

Cougars for the Challenge Cup next year along with the Northern Rail Cup, Championship Title and Grand Final winners totally unbeaten thoughout the season

SL here we come

: Mon Sep 14, 2009 2:11 pm  

I know i will be lambasted for this but what is it with supporters of expansion teams that their point of view is always correct and everyone else is wrong ?