Re: Crusaders into administration? : Thu Dec 02, 2010 11:38 am  

tb wrote:

Or unsubstantiated gossip as its otherwise know. OK.

Nothing like guesswork tb

We had a long and very productive meeting yesterday and reached agreement on all matters of substance,” said RFL Chief Executive Nigel Wood.

“Both Ian (Roberts) and Geoff (Moss) understand and actually agree with the need to deal properly with certain liabilities and to their credit have made provision to do so.

Where exactly does it say in there that they are paying back the RFL? Come on now, certain liabilities does not translate to we are repaying the RFL in full or in part or not at all. Not like you to make assumptions tb, you usually have 'solid proof'

[tb]

Re: Crusaders into administration? : Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:01 pm  

you think that the RFL and Crusaders were seeking an agreement over the liabilities to Brewery Field? weird.

Re: Crusaders into administration? : Thu Dec 02, 2010 1:23 pm  

Your weird pal, WTF are you talking about. Who gives a toss about Brewery field, its a dump.

Will they be repaying the £700k they owe the RFL? Like I said I don't give a monkeys about anything else although I think the creditors might. Thats 700k that could have gone to grass roots RL or Championship clubs, or even SL clubs.

Re: Crusaders into administration? : Thu Dec 02, 2010 7:05 pm  

DemonUK wrote:

Your weird pal, WTF are you talking about. Who gives a toss about Brewery field, its a dump.

Will they be repaying the £700k they owe the RFL? Like I said I don't give a monkeys about anything else although I think the creditors might. Thats 700k that could have gone to grass roots RL or Championship clubs, or even SL clubs.

Why would the rfl give the CHAMPIONSHIP any money? Do we exist? Acording to most sl speccies we do'nt. Thats why there is no continuity between the leagues.

[tb]

Re: Crusaders into administration? : Fri Dec 03, 2010 9:07 am  

DemonUK wrote:

Your weird pal, WTF are you talking about. Who gives a toss about Brewery field, its a dump.

Indeed. So you accept that it clearly was the money owed to the RFL they were talking about when Wood said "they agree with the need to deal properly with certain liabilities and to their credit have made provision to do so" and your "Where exactly does it say in there that they are paying back the RFL?" is, at best, mischef making

Re: Crusaders into administration? : Fri Dec 03, 2010 3:36 pm  

You think your quite clever TB, you try and tie people up on knots by not actually answering questions that have been asked, just what you think has been asked. How can I accept it was the money owed to the RFL they were talking about, it doesn't specifically state that. Lets say it was, the statement 'provision to do so' is woolly at best. Messrs Roberts and Moss I would say are in no position to pay the RFL 700k, if they were Wrexham FC would not be playing in the league they are in at the moment.

You have not answered the question....again. Where does it say it? Nowhere. It doesn't?

Re: Crusaders into administration? : Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:35 pm  

DemonUK wrote:

You think your quite clever TB, you try and tie people up on knots by not actually answering questions that have been asked, just what you think has been asked. How can I accept it was the money owed to the RFL they were talking about, it doesn't specifically state that. Lets say it was, the statement 'provision to do so' is woolly at best. Messrs Roberts and Moss I would say are in no position to pay the RFL 700k, if they were Wrexham FC would not be playing in the league they are in at the moment.

You have not answered the question....again. Where does it say it? Nowhere. It doesn't?

So if having money is the solution to getting what you want how come Man City are not winning everything? Might it be more to do with the fact that there are people with more money running other clubs rather than Moss having none?

Re: Crusaders into administration? : Fri Dec 03, 2010 10:51 pm  

But surely, you must have enough money to run the business/club in the first place.
£2M in two years for any club is a bit on fekkin massive side?

Re: Crusaders into administration? : Fri Dec 03, 2010 11:09 pm  

tb wrote:

Or unsubstantiated gossip as its otherwise know. OK.

well you come back with the exact terms of the repayment, and I'll take you more serious than my source.
But I think you will find that, based on the fact that you think that the crusaders are paying back £700k to what is an unlawful major creditor, very difficult?