Re: DUMB RUGBY : Sat May 29, 2010 8:09 am  

terryc wrote:

Perhaps it's time to give Coleman a go he's a decent kicker and he can't be any worse on the wing than Barnett

Good shout.

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Sat May 29, 2010 9:05 am  

terryc wrote:

Perhaps it's time to give Coleman a go he's a decent kicker and he can't be any worse on the wing than Barnett

Agreed here too. Coleman hasn't done a bad job when he has played.

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Sat May 29, 2010 6:25 pm  

OK I said I wasn't going to listen to Radio Sheffield again but my knee caught the button on Friday just in time to hear Tubbs saying Fordy was welcome to come back but where would he play.

Easy decision out on the same side as Tangi

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Mon May 31, 2010 10:46 pm  

Sheffieldliam wrote:

Well done Keighley. We made stupid errors all night and credit to them they took advantage of them. Stupid errors and poor conversions cost us big time. Was 5 tries to three to us and if we had a better goal kicker then I doubt it would of been a one pointer game.

But anyway great advert for the game, 1271 in the ground on a thursday night on SKY is great IMO and the atmosphere was pretty good especially when we came back second half. Watched Saints for 10 years but the eagles are certainly dividing my loyalties now!

If you had have had Woodcock playing you could have put the Keighley side to sleep with the amount of time he takes with his Kicks

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Tue Jun 01, 2010 7:15 am  

mmmmmm he's certainly not the worst.

But ........ I wish the RFL would do something to speed this part of the game up

[Hillsborough Lad]

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Tue Jun 01, 2010 8:34 am  

The ref is entitled to stop the clock after 30 seconds I think. So it's irrelevant how long a kicker takes really.

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:26 am  

The rules state your allowed 60 seconds from the scoring of the try after which you stop the clock. It is the refs job to enforce this.

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Tue Jun 01, 2010 9:44 am  

faxtastic wrote:

If you had have had Woodcock playing you could have put the Keighley side to sleep with the amount of time he takes with his Kicks

"HE'S GOT A MINUTE!!"

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Tue Jun 01, 2010 11:41 am  

faxtastic wrote:

If you had have had Woodcock playing you could have put the Keighley side to sleep with the amount of time he takes with his Kicks

Damn! Someone's spotted our tactics.

Re: DUMB RUGBY : Tue Jun 01, 2010 10:25 pm  

he uses every last 2nd of it doesnt he.

he doesnt even move any quicker when the kicks right in front of the posts and you could back heel it over