Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 4:40 pm  

EAGLEBLADE II wrote:

Heavily run down city Course it is,Halifax on the other hand what a beautiful place to live full of.......................................oh yes nothing.

Just to clarify, it was me that made the photobucket thing. a) Everyone bar you found it funny. I would suggest you chillax a bit (yeah, I said chillax ) and b) i'm actually from York which is one of Europes most famous Cities and has the 2nd lowest unemployment rate in the UK (plus I have a job, just to clarify). Not that facts should get in the way Does that make it funny now?

(I'd rather live in Sheffield than Halifax though....*runs and hides* )

Re: Sam Barlow : Wed Sep 15, 2010 5:40 pm  

mrs goggins wrote:

I'm not a fan of clauses like this. The big games should have the best players playing in them. This lad shouldn't miss out because of spite/ fear from another club.

I agree I am not a fan of clauses either (except Santa) but until the RFL say that you can't have them they will always exist.

As ESO says when a player signs a contract that should be honoured unless both parties reach an agreement to end it prematurely which in this case must have been the case. Or if the terms of a contract have also been broken by either party in terms of a player going AWOL or a player not being paid etc.

For the Eagles I would assume that a cash settlement would have been preferable but the deal was done as is because one party or the other prefered it that way.

Re: Sam Barlow : Thu Sep 16, 2010 10:08 am  

Reported in the Star http://www.thestar.co.uk/rugbyleague/Eligibility-storm-over-Eagles-rival.6534482.jp Don't agree with the breaking of clause/contract and I would hope that it isn't peer pressure that is forcing him to potentially put his neck in a legal noose. Also bearing in mind does his contract with Fax run into next year? will Fax be solvent next year? will he be looking for a new club? not withstanding burnt bridges how many clubs would trust him with a contract. This could be a carreer breaking move But the lad obviously wants to play and feels he has a point to make against the Eagles so it should make for a good game. A good player with a hot head how long will he stay on the pitch!!

Reported in the Star http://www.thestar.co.uk/rugbyleague/Eligibility-storm-over-Eagles-rival.6534482.jp Don't agree with the breaking of clause/contract and I would hope that it isn't peer pressure that is forcing him to potentially put his neck in a legal noose. Also bearing in mind does his contract with Fax run into next year? will Fax be solvent next year? will he be looking for a new club? not withstanding burnt bridges how many clubs would trust him with a contract. This could be a carreer breaking move But the lad obviously wants to play and feels he has a point to make against the Eagles so it should make for a good game. A good player with a hot head how long will he stay on the pitch!!

Re: Sam Barlow : Thu Sep 16, 2010 11:17 am  

A club and a player with no morals,No respect for that club or player,If i was the Eagles directors etc,I would shun them tonight,I hope they do go bankrupt at the end of the season again and Sam Barlow can find another club,It wont be ours!!!!!

Re: Sam Barlow : Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:08 pm  

EAGLEBLADE II wrote:

A club and a player with no morals,No respect for that club or player,If i was the Eagles directors etc,I would shun them tonight,I hope they do go bankrupt at the end of the season again and Sam Barlow can find another club,It wont be ours!!!!!

Thank you for your well wishes.

Re: Sam Barlow : Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:21 pm  

spanishbob wrote:

Thank you for your well wishes.

No problem,As you can guess i dont like your club or the way it gets run and i dont like the fact how you belittle so called smaller clubs when you should take a leaf out of their book as they are better run and dont go tits up every season with the begging bowl out like yours.Also your fans are rather arrogant and seem to enjoy taking the phiss out of the smaller clubs both on and off the field,A bit like the stupid country mile comment,Your club is a bit of a bully and a bully doesnt like to be confronted and i'll assure you tonight they will be win.lose or draw they'll be no backing down and you know youve been in a game and for the good of rugby and the integrity of the sport ,The Eagles to win.

Re: Sam Barlow : Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:29 pm  

EAGLEBLADE II wrote:

No problem,As you can guess i dont like your club or the way it gets run and i dont like the fact how you belittle so called smaller clubs when you should take a leaf out of their book as they are better run and dont go tits up every season with the begging bowl out like yours.Also your fans are rather arrogant and seem to enjoy taking the phiss out of the smaller clubs both on and off the field,A bit like the stupid country mile comment,Your club is a bit of a bully and a bully doesnt like to be confronted and i'll assure you tonight they will be win.lose or draw they'll be no backing down and you know youve been in a game and for the good of rugby and the integrity of the sport ,The Eagles to win.

Re: Sam Barlow : Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:32 pm  

Well, I expect we'll be playing them on a regular basis.

No chance of Superleague having them in the foreseeable future after this season.

They might have ticked the Grand Final box but the others are empty.

Re: Sam Barlow : Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:38 pm  

griff1998 wrote:

Well, I expect we'll be playing them on a regular basis.

No chance of Superleague having them in the foreseeable future after this season.

They might have ticked the Grand Final box but the others are empty.

Exactly!

* Don't tick turnover box
* Don't tick the attendance box
* Decided not to bother signing up to the RFL academy programme (unlike Eagles and Fev)
* Too near to Bradford

At least they're not as whiney as Leigh fans though. I wish they'd give it a rest with their "the world is against us" bit.

Re: Sam Barlow : Thu Sep 16, 2010 1:41 pm  

My view, for what it's worth (and I'm trying to view it without my blue and white specs on) is that it's not about honouring a contract per se, it's more the wording of it ie - do the playoffs count as "the season"?

On our side of the fence, we're short on bodies plain and simple so we need him to play. On your side of the fence, you know we're decimated by injury and it's the perfect distraction to play head games.

Plus it's big money game for the victor and to add to that Radio Leeds was reporting this morning that the clause not to play was only verbal between Sheffield and Sam.

Would Sheffield be making such a song and dance about it if he'd signed for a team you'd be confident of beating, say, in a lower down division? I can't help thinking that it's less about morals and principle and more to with gaining an advantage because your coach isn't confident of beating us.

Thoughts?

PS - I've read a lot about him being a "liability" on here. He might have been in the Red & Gold, he certainly hasn't been in the Blue & White. I hope he does play and it adds to the spectacle. Safe journey over to all this evening