They should just revert to the old adage: "If you want a n[ii[/igger for a neighbour, vote Labour"

Are you and if so why?

That's completely unnecessary.

Yes I am bothered and I am bothered because I don't like the idea of my country becoming fractured.

YOUR country?



Are you The Queen or summat?



This country is no more yours than it is mine or any other citizen living here

There is more to worry about tearing this country apart than a strange article in the Daily Mail worrying about something that has happened for hundreds of years.

No, we've all worked out the blindingly obvious reasons why people might prefer to live amongst people with whom they feel they have more in common.

Yes, it is my country. I was born and raised here. That makes it my country. If you were born and raised here, it is your country too.





No, but that is a very childish statement.

First of all I said fracturing and secondly I read about the same issue in the Sunday Times today, as I mentioned in my first post on this thread.

No, it makes it the country you were born and raised in and currently live in (presumably). It is no more your country than any other citizen, whether they were born and raised her or simply came and decided to stay.



You are aware that your xenophobia is showing?

In the Godless world of most on here they love the term "evolution." So, why then have races evolved with quite different attributes which are linked to the geographical areas to which they "belong"? Animals are generally territorial and need to understand their territory to survive. Humans are the same and that explains in large part the amount of time they spend at war. So, I think he has a valid point about when he refers to "my country." That's also why so many people are concerned and dismayed about mass immigration - often the number one issue when they speak to their MP - because alot of people do not feel it is "their" country anymore. I think you'll also find the main unspoken reason why white folk have been moving out of cities is to try to turn back the clock and live with folk like them in places that seem still to be "their" own country.



Of course, in the PC world all that would be heresy.

It was an article in a publication that frequently lies, that profits from the sexualisation of underage girls, and that has an editorial policy of shocking its readers on a daily basis.



And you want me to take it seriously when it publishes another sensationalist piece of scaremongering with no context whatsoever? And you think that my stating something directly contradicts (with inconvenient facts) some of what has been spouted here is of no relevance?



And the [iSunday Times[/i is a Murdoch paper that is also prepared to publish lies when the truth of a story doesn't match its agenda. And I do have the proof of that, and the previous assertion re the [iMail[/i.



The 'trend' is not new and it is not limited to ethnicity/religion. Demographics change over time. This is a fact.