Isn't David "expenses scandal" Laws supposed to be coming back? If so, I hope there is a public uprising.

Junior education minister. £56,000.

Which, ironically enough, is almost exactly the amount he swindled on expenses.

Forgive me mate.



I thought for one, stupid, absurd moment, that you honestly believed ministerial positions were delegated on the tenure of the relevant candidates capabilities.



As I'm sure you're probably aware it's a lot more to do with 'toethelineabilityitis'.

That is the amount he swindled on expenses. Lest we forget.

It really is outrageous. If this didn't show there is one law for the rich and powerful and another for the rest of us I don't know what does.

Oh I know that. But there's usually [isome[/i attempt to avoid utterly absurd appointments. This is like CaMoron's given up already and has decided to just have a laugh for the remainder of his tenure.

You're short by £592.00 or thereabouts.





I thought you might have been quoting his new salary, which would have had a certain perverse symmetry about it.

As to Hunt he is a real champion of the NHS:



[urlhttp://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/60538/hunt_and_the_nhs_olympics.html[/url

"Women know if we're not at the table, we're on the menu," Ceri Goddard, chief executive of the Fawcett Society, on the reshuffle so far.

[url=http://eoin-clarke.blogspot.co.uk/There's more[/url



He's a mucker of Daniel Hannan, it's difficult to find a more odious tory than he.

And some more (not as bad as that link):



[urlhttp://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/tomchiversscience/100179258/jeremy-hunt-health-secretary-thinks-homeopathy-works/[/url



There is enough ammunition in these various links for a half decent opposition to have Cameron and Hunt on the back foot (to put it mildly) from day one.