That people will believe any old sh[ii[/it if it appears in their favourite religious text?

Guess again.

No, thanks. I'll stick with my first answer, as it's the one the evidence best supports.

why guess, surely God wants us all to understand, and be living true and virtuous lives, made in his image, you know, the image of a spiteful vengeful old man who sacrificed his son to appease his own wrath?



E V I D E N C E



F A C T S



have any of those?



no, just delusion, and f'w'y in abundance.

Yawn.



Why don't you all just have an old fashioned duel or something.



Whoever loses dies. THE END.

Like the dark ages?

[url=http://wonkette.com/476114/texas-gop-will-literally-and-nonmetaphorically-ban-critical-thinkingThe GOP in Texas have a plan....[/url

Ey up, one of the resident right-wing nut-jobs has turned up.



Considering entering the debate at all or just doing your usual flaming again?

And you're wrong again. Science has frequently investigated the supernatural and found there to be no evidence to support the existence of it in the commonly accepted sense. Ditto the paranormal.





Only if you don't understand what critical analysis actually means.





Not objectively or independently. Which is the key point.

As a scientist myself, I can assure you that on the evidence of your posts you don't. At all. In any way.

How can science investigate the supernatural? How do you put God in a test tube?









You're saying the same as the other poster. Yours is the only conclusion which is sensible and everyone else's is silly. Why?







What if those people were Muslims, Jews and even atheists? You can't get much more independent of Christianity than that