Why indeed nobody is allowed to have a different opinion in case it will upset somebody unless you are on Soshull Meeja where you can literally say anything with no consequences

I’m surmising it’s because of the passive aggressive approach of this atomic character , don’t see why the topics have to be locked though , just sin bin him if it’s a problem.

Surely if you don't like summat you can just scroll on by? So long as it's not abusive that is, then that poster could be warned and/or banned.

Different opinions aren't a problem at all, but when people stray towards suggestions of financial irregularity, even whilst using vague language, then unfortunately the conversation has to end before anyone says anything potentially libelous.



Feel free to continue the conversation about the original topics in alternative threads.

A tad preemptive in my view considering what was actually written.libel is often quoted in an early salvo ,but very rarely proved or even actioned without extremely deep pockets