Wakefield missed the first 3 seasons of SL, the first season was out of our control, after we was evicted from the SL project in a act of gross injustice.



Castleford have missed 2 seasons of SL due to not been able to cut it on the field. Two embarrassing relegations, on both occasions the fatal blow coming from Wakefield.



You also have to consider Castleford great fortune in staying in SL. If the franchise system hadn't been introduced Cas would of been relegated last season, which imo would of been justice. You should be punished not rewarded for having such an uncompetitive season.



A change in the rules for play off qualifying also benefited Cas, any other year a 8th place finish would got you jack!



Wakefield are a better club, deal with it!

Are we still on for that November start date for the construction of the stadium Gaslight? You were certainly doing some spouting on here a few months ago about it. Time to wake up and face reality buddy!

So the fact you were outside the division was an injustice but for Cas it was down to us? The fact you weren't considered was because you were to put it plain and simply - sh*t.



You know for a fact that 2007 gave us the opportunity to blood the youngsters...where are yours? Apart from Ferguson you've not produced one first-choice first teamer during the last two years? Also, had relegation been in place in 2007 you would have seen a completely different Cas team. Stop talking crap.

Huddersfield have three wooden spoons, what's your point? In all reality, they should have been relegated too but they were saved by crap teams in the division below.



The fact we got promoted at the first attempt both times shows we don't deserve to be in NL1.

Cas had their own destiny in their own hands. Finish bottom (excluding Catalans) and you go down. Everybody knew this the rules were set and everyone knew the score.



If you know anything about Rugby League you would know what happened regarding the introduction of SL. I'm not going to make up for your lack of knowledge by posting what would be a long winded explanation.

Right bitchfight on here innit





So what are they going to do , drop 1 , drop 2 , drop none nad bring 2 up ?

So was it not Wakefield's fault they weren't included in SL, even if partly? Do Keighley and Widnes not have more of a claim to be aggrieved? Take off those blue, white and red glasses and see that Wakefield's destiny, like Castleford's, is in their own hands. This bitch fighting is getting very tedious, especially considering we have very little, if any, control over what happens at Red Hall in 1 and half years time.

God, we've got 1.5 years of this?

My point is in the last decade Wakefield have been the superior team.

In your own head. Unfortunately, the majority of other people, including neutrals, would probably disagree.

Over the past 5 years, yes. Over the 5 years from 1999 to 2004, no - consistently much lower.



FINAL LEAGUE PSOISTIONS:



Wakey Cas

2009 7 8

2008 8 12

2007 - -

2006 10 11

2005 - -

2004 6 12

2003 11 8

2002 11 6

2001 11 6

2000 10 5

1999 11 5



AVE: 9.4 8.1

2 relegations and a wooden spoon.

How can you say that.