well.....? this is my part of the argument.



Do you think RFL will relagate them...I think NOT...



Rules are made to be broken...just ask the RFL

If a club does all of that they will get a license. It was said by Nigel Wood that the best performing NL club will get a license.

Congratulations for bringing out 3 examples from the history of super league which argue otherwise. clearly my argument is outgunned by such strong counter evidence. The wakefield/castleford battle, thinking about it, was a complete waste of interest.

For God's sake STOP throwing this back into these arguments. I don't want to read it. It was 6 years ago. SIX ! Let it go.







bluesox4evaaa - shut the f**k up ! You're forcing people to drag up the horrid past of Halifax RLFC. You're also embarrassing yourself. Enough already. Enough.

Or your post



Losing interest rapidly , like lots of our fans

Are you really that desperate that you have to start acting sexist to make yourself feel superior? I know you're failing to bring up a decent argument, but I didn't think you needed to sink THAT low!

OMG ..o.k they stop meeting the critia in any fu***g shape or form then...stop trying to twist your argument



or lets just say halifax meet more critia points than Quinns/Wigan etc...would RFL swap them places ?

I am certainly not. in fact i am thoroughly enjoying this.

Sorry, I had no intention of bringing up a bad part of your history to embarrass you!

If your ansrew is no...then this is just not the way forward....if you answer yes...I think you lieing to yourself



If they would then yes...maybe this is the way forward, but in a realistic world of RFL thats not going to happen is it?

On or Off pitch , and who makes that decision ?

........... your lack of substance and basic grasp of reality is making your contributions embarrassing. It's a bit cringeworthy to be honest.

going with a womans argument on this issue would be more dangerous than allowing a monkey to fly a plane

I aren't trying to twist anything. You're trying to bring up a completely hypothetical argument that you cannot prove right or wrong, so no matter what I reply you will still disagree with. What's the point?



If Wigan, Saints or anyone in the SL didn't meet ANY criteria to be in SL, then I guarantee that they would not be in the SL. Anyone that is trying to argue that they would despite not meeting ANY criteria is simply idiotic.

It'll count against them in the next round of license applications.

Thanks. I feel better now.

like the awarding of franchises

Edited for accuracy.

Presumably going by the criteria and the decisional will be made by the licence panel.

If you think a club can be in SL and not achieve ANY of the criteria, you are deluding yourself.

i dont mean if they dont meet ANY



lets just say halifax meet more critia points than Quinns/Wigan etc...would RFL swap them places



Top goes up, bottom goes down....theres no arguments then....make NRL1 more competitve and if your sat at bottom of SL, you need to bck your ideas up or your going down.



Lets not have some people in suits making up ideas of why a team should be there and who shouldnt

Which is nothing more than somebodies opinion , and therefore no more relative than yours or mine

One, I'm a bloke.



Two, you are an ignoramous.

well...... [size=200SPOT ON CHAP[/size

No, they wouldn't swap them, because that's not how the process works.



You really need to understand the licensing process more before trying to argue against it.