Welcome to the NEW RLFANS.COM. After twenty-five years of service, the old site expired over the last few days. To maintain service we have had no option but to make an early switch to the new site which was in development/testing. Some elements of the new site are unfinished, such as; page numbering and quotations. We will fix these minor issues as soon as we can, please bear with us. If you are having problems logging in, please try a different browser or platform, if problems persist then email support@rlfans.com
I'll be surprised if we don't shift Grix to right second row and play Cooper loose.
Wilkin will line up on the left edge for them so you can have a mobile backrower in that position, start with Grix and give Blythe a stint there (who's playing really well at the minute).
All that said, with Tony, it wouldn't shock me to turn up and Bridge be in the backrow.
What I will say is that maybe leading with the forearm (to any part of the body) and the shoulder charge should be looked at by the RFL with a view to banning them from the game, but that is not today's ruling.
Quotethe ditch="the ditch"Get Stuffed...'"
Saddo is correct.
That Lauaki one shouldn't even have been a penalty as shown by the disciplinary.
What I will say is that maybe leading with the forearm (to any part of the body) and the shoulder charge should be looked at by the RFL with a view to banning them from the game, but that is not today's ruling.
What I will say is that maybe leading with the forearm (to any part of the body) and the shoulder charge should be looked at by the RFL with a view to banning them from the game, but that is not today's ruling.'"
You said Bridge should have been banned against Huddersfield. Why?
QuoteRogues Gallery="Rogues Gallery"Saddo is correct.
That Lauaki one shouldn't even have been a penalty as shown by the disciplinary.
What I will say is that maybe leading with the forearm (to any part of the body) and the shoulder charge should be looked at by the RFL with a view to banning them from the game, but that is not today's ruling.'"
You said Bridge should have been banned against Huddersfield. Why?
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
