I'm with you VL.

Thornley McNally and mason picked up knocks, I would imagine the Hull lads and woods would be kept CC free just in case at this stage

I thought Bienek, Scott and Woods were all 'season long loans' - if so, am I right in thinking they can't be recalled by their parent clubs for CCup or SL back up ?

I thought they had to give them 28 days notice

Imagine Hull getting to the CCF and having an injury crisis but the lads couldn't play due to playing Batley, we aint going to win it so lets give the squad a run out and focus on the 1895 for a day at Wembley

Which cup competition is the more financially beneficial to the club?

1895

Not really an answer Mo. If Mr Beaumont’s business gains from it then good call. Does it? What’s a quarter final worth these days in the CC.



Have you got a new pair of blinkers this season?

Well it seems to be an answer to the question as originally asked.



I also don’t think Maurice has blinkers, he seems to be a loyal supporter with a bit of extra knowledge every so often, and sense of humour.

He also carries his own opinion without debate..

You asked a direct question and got a direct answer, what's your problem?

You gave an opinion of binning the CC as they won’t win. Take the 1895 cup on for a day in Wembley.



They are in the bag for the next round in the CC. Do you still disagree?