[/u



My thoughts too.

Not sure I wanted Ford either. He is a liability in defence and does not like being tackled. Just get Ioanne or Amone to charge at him and a huge gap will appear.

Seriously Reynolds better than Chisholm. Dane has moved the troops round the park well every time I have seen him, which is a damn sight more than "1 good game in 10" Reynolds.

You answered the question in your previous post. We also have Ata Hingano who is a tidy all round player.

And I think that Reynolds will offer more over the season than Chisholm and although currently injured Reynolds is not as injury prone as Chisholm.

When was the last time Chisholm missed a game, or a series of games, due to injury?

I wonder if Lam could be back on the menu?

During his time with Hull KR Chisholm had a ten month spell out with injury.

So you're basing the "injury-prone" tag on his period at Hull KR, which ended in 2015?

Apologies, I should have said during his time with Bradford.

Derek has said on twitter (don’t do twitter but saw a copy of the post on Facebook) that we did not show interest in Kerallah or Ford, though both were offered. He also said we are recruiting to strengthen so neither must have looked that way to Lam and Chester.

He did say that there is still plenty of time and one will be announced soon enough.

I must say that the additions so far do seem to mirror exactly that statement of recruitment to strengthen, so no reason to doubt we will be stronger as the season goes on.

Right now I believe we are strong enough to beat Fev with their two recent additions.

Patience and support Leythers.

[/u



Good post VL, however, i think Fev just have the edge over us atm but, as the season progresses, i think/hope we are in a stronger/better position to do the business when it matters, hopefully (without any key injuries).